Home > Archive > Archive Lifestyle >

Reviews for Depilatories / Hair Removal for Women in General


Waxing: Not as Bad as it's Made Out - Honest! -  Depilatories / Hair Removal for Women in General Archive Lifestyle
Depilatories / Hair Removal for Women in General 

Newest Review: ... them to. I usually get fed up and wash the whole lot off before the time is up. This summer I decided to try waxing for the first time... more

Waxing: Not as Bad as it's Made Out - Honest! (Depilatories / Hair Removal for Women in General)

delawney

Member Name: delawney

Product:

Depilatories / Hair Removal for Women in General

Date: 29/11/02 (3514 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: Lasts about 3 weeks, Less hair grows back

Disadvantages: Having to let hair grow first, Discomfort

Hair removal. The bane of any woman's life. It's there, it keeps on growing, and one way or another most of us regularly attempt to rid ourselves of it. But what is the best way?

My method of choice, contrary to many of the ops I've read, is waxing. It gets effective results and lasts for ages, and the more you do it, the less the hair comes back. How cool is that?

So I have to start with a confession. I am absolutely rubbish at shaving my legs. The first time I ever tried it (I was about ten - sneakily in the bathroom with my stepmother's razor - yuk!) I managed to take a huge gouge out of my leg. Not much has changed since. Everytime I do shave my legs I always manage to get a few nicks and cuts here and there, and it's not much fun.

So a couple of years ago I decided to take the plunge and have a go at getting my legs waxed. "How bad can it be?", I thought. I am lucky enough that our local council provides a rather lovely spa at affordable prices, and as well as luxuriating jacuzzis and a steam room they offer beauty treatments, so it seemed to be a sensible place to start.

I'd booked in for a half-leg wax and an eyebrow shape. (I'm also crap at shaping my eyebrows - hey, I'm not particularly vain and it's all too much like hard work). My mistake, of course, was not being able to resist using the spa facilities first. You see, in order to have your legs waxed, there has to be enough hair there for the wax to cling onto, so you have to have a fair amount of "growth", to put it delicately. Not really what you want when you're in a bathing suit. Suffice to say I spent as much time as I could under water.

So, after a nice relaxing (if a little self-conscious) soak, I went off slightly apprehensively for my leg wax. As should be the case, it was all in private and I felt pretty relaxed about the surroundings.


*** WHAT'S INVOLVED?
***

You need to have at least 5 mm of hair growth, preferably a bit more, for the waxing to be effective. Fortunately, I knew this, so there wasn't any early embarrassment due to lack of hair.

The therapist took a large orange stick (that's like an ice lolly stick for those that don't know) and dipped it into the warm wax. The wax is warm on the skin, but it shouldn't be uncomfortably hot. I might be a bit weird, but I actually found it quite pleasant. The therapist then pushes a cotton strip down firmly against the skin, and tears it off in a swift motion.

Now, this was the moment where I was expecting intense pain. But there wasn't really any. It was no worse than having an elastoplast ripped off really. Now of course, I would be fibbing if I said it didn't hurt at all, of course it was not a pleasant experience. But it certainly wasn't excrutiating, and it was over so quickly I hardly had chance to notice.

The therapist was very quick and efficient, and the whole task only took about ten minutes a leg. She then went over them quickly with a pair of tweezers to remove any shorter hairs the waxing had missed. Finally she spread a soothing balm solution over my legs.

I must have been feeling brave, as once she started on my eyebrows she asked if I minded if she waxed the edges to save time. I wnet for it, and again, I really didn't think it was that bad. And she did a smashing job of the eyebrows too!


*** AFTERCARE ***

As I had my legs waxed at the spa, they make a big point of telling you that you should use the spa facilities BEFORE the waxing and not afterwards. This is because you shouldn't expose your legs to hot water for approximately 24 hours after a wax, as it makes the skin really sensitive. Of course, the downside to this is that if you want to sit in a jacuzzi (and who doesn't?) you will have to do it with hairy legs!

It'
s important to exfoliate thoroughly if you have your legs (or any other part of your body for that matter) waxed. This is because waxing can cause ingrowing hairs. If I spot one, I carefully extract it with tweezers. I'm not sure if that's recommended or not, so don't quote me on it!


*** THE RESULTS ***

I was told the waxing should keep the legs hair free for about three weeks, and I would say that's about right. During that time my legs were perfectly smooth, and suddenly skirts and short trousers bore no fear!


*** COST ***

The whole procedure cost £11.50 for both legs, not that expensive in my opinion. A full leg wax would have taken the cost up to approximately £16.

Incidentally, the eyebrow shape was less than a fiver.


*** THE PLUS POINTS ***

* Lasts approximately three weeks
* The more you wax, the less the hair grows back
* Doesn't hurt anywhere near as much as you think it will
* Not particularly expensive - probably no more expensive than disposable razors
* Looks fab!


*** THE MINUS POINTS ***

* You do have to let the hair grow first - in the summer this can be a real pain as you have to wear trousers (unless you want to show off your delightfully hairy legs), and can cause problems of timing if a special event comes up where you want to get your legs out (oo-er missus)
* Not for people with a low pain threshold
* Need to exfoliate thoroughly and watch out for those ingrowing hairs


*** ANOTHER POINT TO NOTE ***

I am writing specifically about having your legs waxed professionally at a spa or salon. I admit I haven't tried it, but I really don't think I would bother with a home waxing system. From the ops I've read on here, they seem rather expensive and a rather terrible experience. A professional therapist is practised and knows what they are doing. They know how to under
take the procedure to inflict the minimum possible amount of pain. I wouldn't trust myself to do it!


*** CONCLUSION ***

Waxing is really not as bad as you might think. If you have tried it and it really hurt, I would question your therapist as much as the waxing yourself. Sure, it is not a comfortable experience, but it is really not that bad. Personally, being as useless as I am at shaving my legs, I actually find it a less unpleasant experience. The effects are great and long-lasting. The only real downside is having to let the hair grow back before the next wax.

Go on - be brave - you wouldn't want me to call you a wuss now would you?

Summary:

Last members to rate this review:
(15 members total)

majorb%2FShuyanin59%2Fgoodasgold%2Fcalypte%2Fsandrabarber%2FOphelia%2F

View all 15 member ratings

Overall rating: Very useful

Nominate for a Crown:

See all newly Crowned Reviews

Last comments:
majorb

- 02/05/03

Waxing isn't all that painful and gives a lovely, smooth result but, as you say, it's the blummin' waiting around until the hair's long enough that's the worst part. As I swim regularly, that's why I tend to stick with my good old Venus razor.
Klytemnestra

- 02/01/03

My word, lucky you, where is this place?

And does anyone know what "dermatologically tested" actually means in real terms? Technically, it just means "tested on skin", which is hardly news. Sometimes I suspect that companies put it on in the place they should be putting "not tested on animals", and people are lulled into thinking it's something that's done instead of testing on animals. Or maybe there's some special sort of testing called "dermatological" ;. Or perhaps it's just like "orthopaedic" mattresses, it doesn't actually mean anything in real terms, it just looks impressive!

Or did you mean there's some brand called "Dermalogica"?

Anyway, I never could cope with waxing, so not sure why I'm asking. The first time I tried waxing my legs, my flatmate was standing over me and I got it all done. The second time, I chickened out after half a leg. The third time I went to a salon, which wasn't as bad, but I didn't fancy the cost of that on a regular basis, so I went back to shaving until I discovered epilators. Then my joints got worse, making it three times as painful to rip hairs out, so I'm currently back on shaving!

Any advice on make-up? The Body Shop were iffy enough already, but now they've got animal ingredients in just about everything, so they're off the list. I've just bought some Molton Brown eye make-up, and it's getting another trial or two but probably going back to the shop. Beauty Without Cruelty are poor quality and have started putting silk in everything, Barry M look cheap and nasty, and Urban Decay allegedly are not animal tested and do some vegan make-up but everyone's given up on them since they persistently refuse to answer questions on the subject (BUAV say they've tried several times). Where does this leave us? I'm currently after various shades of eyeshadow, including black since I use eyeshadow and a little brush instead of eyeliner, it's the only way I've found that doesn't leave you with panda eyes.

And any idea how you can review a product if it's not already listed? I'd quite like to review Veganstore and a few other places.
delawney

- 31/12/02

Klytemnestra

The salon I go to use dermalogica products, which are not tested on animals. I emailed them and they assured me their products are suitable for vegans.

I may well try an epilator though (having read your op!) to save the hassle of always having to go to a salon!

View all 14 comments


Product of the week
Top