| Product: |
LASIK Treatments |
| Date: |
25/02/01 (2957 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: few for the patient - considerable for the industry behind these surgeries
Disadvantages: too risky and success is definitely not guaranteed
The laser corrective surgery for the eye has not achieved as much popularity as predicted a few years ago. The reason for this is not only that people are scared of having surgeons messing about with their eyes but because the results obtained from these corrective surgeries has not been overwhelmingly great. Indeed there is a strong (probably increasing) community in the field who are strongly against the corrective eye surgery in its current forms. Let me start off with a brief description of vision and vision correction in general. The eye is a simple optical system - the cornea (outermost surface of the eye) and the lens focus light coming from an object onto the retina (back part of the eye) which acts light a photographic film. The image formed on the retina is then processed by the brain to produce the image that we actually see. However the eye is far from being a perfect optical system - it introduces irregular deviations to the light entering it so that the image produced on the retina is a blurred copy of the original object. These deviations are known as aberrations. In a person with good eyesight, these aberrations are small and the blurring is not very significant. However in some people these aberrations are considerable and the image formed on the retina is of a rather poor quality. These people need some form of correction to enhance the image produced on the retina. Spectacles and contact lenses are the most common forms of vision correction - they try to redirect the light so that the blurring of the image on the retina in minimised. However the eye produces a large number of different aberrations and spectacles and contact lenses can only correct two of these aberrations, known to the optometrists as defocus (myopia or hypermetropia) and astigmatism. (Myopia and hypermetropia are also known as short- and long-sightedness respectively). In most eyes, correcting for these two aberrations is enough to improve vision substantially, but these
are not the only aberrations in the eye. Laser corrective eye surgeries also attempt to correct for these two aberrations, but the mechanics of how this is done is clearly very different from spectacles or contact lenses. LASIK is the most common of these surgeries. Surgeons try to change the shape of the cornea so that light is correctly focused on the retina - but unfortunately this procedure is not as easy as it may sound. The surface of the cornea is not a perfect sphere or any other perfectly smooth surface, but it is irregular. This makes the process of understanding what corrections are necessary difficult. Besides that, even if it were possible to precisely predict what shape of cornea is required, there is still the challenge of actually producing that exact shape during the surgery. The main problems with the LASIK surgery are briefly explained below: (1) Many people believe that laser eye surgery is performed exclusively by using non-invasive lasers. In actual fact, physical incisions to the cornea are still made before the laser is used. This means that the cornea must undergo natural healing at the locations were incisions were made. This produces a highly irregular surface at these locations, and these irregularities on the cornea introduce some other aberrations which were previously inexistent. The effect of these so called higher order aberrations may not be as significant as defocus and astigmatism, but they still cause some blurring to the image formed on the retina. The effect of these higher order aberrations is particularly noticeable at night when the lower light intensity causes the pupils to dilate, and hence light passes through a larger area of the irregular cornea. (2) The physical incisions as well as the laser ablation of the cornea results in a thinner cornea after the surgery. I have deliberately omitted a description of the LASIK surgery since it might adversely affect sensitive readers The final
outcome is, however, that the cornea is thinnest at the centre of the pupil and this can be dangerous in some cases. (3) Another major concern of corrective eye surgery is that in a substantial number of cases, full correction is not achieved. People having 6D of myopia, say, might have a correction of only 4D which still leaves them with 2D of myopia - hence they would still require spectacles or contact lenses. People who spend so much money on corrective surgeries would not be very pleased of the fact that they would still require spectacles or lenses! The reason for this partial correction is that the processes of predicting the required cornea shape and producing that shape are restricted by current technology. Hence for most of the eyes which need correction, it is very difficult to obtain perfect correction of the eyesight. This is clearly a major drawback to LASIK and other corrective surgery techniques. (4) One other significant point to mention is that the aberrations of the eye are not constant but they change with time. Thus, the effects of a successful laser surgery (assuming that you can have a successful laser surgery) will only last for a few years. With spectacles the problem is easily resolvable - buy a new pair of specs - but repeating the eye surgery every decade, say, somehow does not sound so easy! At the end of the day everyone has to make his or her own decision on whether to take the risk or not. What I can say is that I would never consider having laser corrective surgery, in any of its current forms, performed on my eyes even though my eyesight is not that good. I definitely prefer specs sitting on my nose then the hazards and inconveniences of eye corrective surgery. If you are considering LASIK, beware.
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 05/01/03 OK, I too found this a very useful op, but a few points on both the op and the comments here:
1. You can't use 4 or 6 friends as proper data. I'm not running down advice from people who've actually gone through it, I've got M.E. myself and talking to the few people I know who also suffer from it is very useful, but it doesn't give you an overview.
2. As Squiffy points out, we still don't know exactly what "successful" means in these cases, and so on.
3. It would probably be helpful if people were to state medical or other qualifications and outline personal experience. This isn't a site specifically for medics, so you can't expect all the opinions to be by doctors, although obviously those are particularly valuable in situations such as these. On the other hand, you shouldn't take what people say here as gospel either, just consider their opinion. If your own wife is an ophthalmic nurse, you're fairly likely to trust her. If it's the wife of a complete stranger on an anonymous wesbite, it's a bit different. (No disrespect: I wouldn't expect people to take my word for it either.)
4. Links for data would really be useful and probably stop some of the squabbling! Sgrup, I know you didn't want to upset people with the details, but it would be good to have the options of looking them up. Besides, in the academic world you always have to give references ;)
5. Does anyone know how long it's going to be before they have decent data on long-term effects, or is that a silly question?
6. Well, it was fairly likely Sgrup wasn't going to be talking from personal experience, considering his (her?) conclusions. Doesn't invalidate his/her research. |
|
- 12/01/02 A quick response to Groundzero. PRK is IMHO far more risky than Lasik. In Lasik a flap is cut into the cornea. I'm not aware of any cases where the flap has been unstable, or has caused any long term problems. PRK on the other hand (where the surface of the eye is scratched off) can cause serious problems with scarring, and therefore haze at night. PRK is far more intrusive and risky than Lasik.
As for sgrup - you are right to urge caution. However I'm one of many people who've had Lasik and are delighted with the results. My wife is an ophthalmic nurse, and I trust her judgement completely that it is safe. She should know - she used to work in an NHS clinic that saw Lasik patients for pre-assessments and post-ops.
I' d also say that the failure rate of 1 in 12 is misleading. Of those '1's, how many are unhappy with their result? Were they expecting to get 20/20 vision, or were they just happy to reduce their dependence on glasses as Matonk points out?
Oh, and for the record I've gone from -7.50 to almost 20/20 vision, which has been stable since April 99. |
|
- 22/10/01 I am glad you have highlighted the potential risks and problems with this surgery, as no-one should go into it without being aware of them. However, I know 4 people who have been successful with the operation and none who have been unsiccessful. I have had radial keratotomy (the pre-cursor to laser) and the results were as expected (not completely cured and minor side effects). Despite the problems, I do not regret it for one minute as I was so blind I was unable to wear glasses without feeling sick (due to the distortion). I am so pleased to wear very thin glasses now! |
View all
16
comments
|