Good Wives? - Margaret Forster Reviews

Good Wives? - Margaret Forster Biography

Description:ISBN 0701169141 /

amazon
Price ComparisonWrite a Review

Price Comparison for Good Wives? - Margaret Forster

Margaret Forster Good Wives?
The question mark in the title of Margaret Forster's triple biogr ...
Last Update 25.05.2013 10:12

£ 0.00

£ 25.00 Good Wives? - Margaret Forster go shopping
amazon.co.uk marketplace
 
Similar Offers for Good Wives? - Margaret Forster
Margaret Forster Good Wives: Mary, Fanny,Jennie and Me, 1845-2001 ...
Why do many women still get married? Why do others not? Why do co ...
Last Update 25.05.2013 09:41

£ 0.00

24 hours
£ 7.58 Good Wives? - Margaret Forster go shopping
amazon.co.uk
Good Wives? by Margaret Forster
Free Worldwide Delivery : Good Wives? : Paperback : VINTAGE : 978 ...
Last Update 25.05.2013 09:21

£ 0.00

In Stock
£ 8.85
bookdepository.co.uk
Margaret Forster Good Wives: Mary, Fanny,Jennie and Me, 1845-2001 ...
Why do many women still get married? Why do others not? Why do co ...
Last Update 25.05.2013 10:12

£ 0.00

£ 5.10 Good Wives? - Margaret Forster go shopping
amazon.co.uk marketplace
 

More Offers

Good Wives? - Margaret Forster Opinions

Reviews for similar products

Foxy-Lady

Hidden Lives: A Family Memoir - Margaret Forster

Premium Review Family Secrets (916 words)
by Foxy-Lady - written on 23/11/05 (Very useful, 1280 readings)
Rating:

locations when various street names are mentioned. The initial chapter briefly explains how and why certain seeds of doubt are sown and questions raised regarding a particular branch of Margaret Forsters family tree. An element of the family history that has always been quite mysterious and unexplained to an extent. The mystery surrounds Margaret Ann, the grandmother of the author. Research unearths details of her mother Annie, her pitiful birth and the circumstances surrounding it. The reader is given some little known background and history of the family at the time. Annie died when Margaret Ann was only 2 years old and a void then seems to have been purposely ...