Blu-ray Movies
Offers
Reviews
|
|
Green Lantern (Blu-ray 3D + DVD + Digital Copy)
by broxi3781 This movie has drawn mixed reviews, but I really enjoyed watching it last night, as did my both of my children. This is not serious drama, nor should you be expecting academy award winning acting. But it is good comic book fun to enjoy with the family, and has excellent 3D segments as well. This incarnation of Green Lantern ... features Hal Jordan - the real Green Lantern in my opinion, and is loosely based on the Geoff Johns graphic novels - in fact you'll even see a short ad for them at the end of the film. For those unfamiliar with the comic book heroes, the Green Lanterns are an intergalactic peace keeping force dedicating to protecting the universe from evil. Their powers come from green rings which allow their will to become manifest - they can create anything they can imagine. No human has ever been chosen for this role before - humans not being the most peaceful species to begin with - or the most evolved in the opinion of many existing lanterns. But when Abin Sur crash lands on the earth, his ring chooses his replacement, bringing test pilot Hal Jordan to him, just before his death. I'm sure you all know the old comic book line "with great power comes great responsibility". The problem, responsibility has never been Hal Jordan's strong suit. Lanterns are meant to be without fear too, but to be human is to know fear. Hal is not fearless, and does not really seem like lantern material, but the ring has chosen him for a reason, and his human frailties may become his strong point as well as he learns to accept and overcome his fear. Let's hope so - because the fate of the earth,and perhaps even the universe hangs in the balance in classic good vs evil battle between Hal Jordan and Parallax, an all powerful evil being that is powered by fear. The plot is somewhat thin, many aspects are quite predictable, and there are of course a few comic book cliches. I have to admit laughing at a cheap line where Hal's former love interest recognises him, despite the mask, making light of the time honoured comic book tradition that a bit of cloth over the the eyes, or taking off a pair of glasses renders the hero completely unrecognisable to even his nearest and dearest. Ryan Reynolds just doesn't match my image of Hal Jordan. It is somewhat like getting Robin Williams to play James Bond to me, but I did get used to it. The acting is acceptable - but there are no spectacular performances here - then again they didn't have much to work with. But I was not expecting a stunning dramatic performance, I only wanted an action filled light hearted film to enjoy with my children, and this did fit the bill. My youngest wasn't too sure about watching this. At age 4, he prefers all animated films. I wasn't sure if he would stay interested in this or not myself, but the scenes which feature human interaction are kept to a minimum. Every time his interest started to wane the film would switch back to CGI sections, with superheroes and fascinating aliens and his interest would be captured again. There was plenty of action and adventure to keep both of my sons interested, and enough special effects for me to really enjoy the film as well. It is the special effects that make this film - especially the 3D. Without 3D this film would be watchable - but I don't think it would be worth paying for. Even the 3-d on this drew mixed ratings though, and that is because some of the 3D is really excellent, but other parts are quite lacklustre. This is because some scenes, like humans talking in an office just don't really lend themselves well to the 3D medium. You can still see depth, but nothing exciting. Other scenes which are largely computer generated imagery can be developed wonderfully for 3D, so we have some brilliant scenes in space, and even on earth with cgi battles, but we also have some rather dull earth scenes, where you can easily just remove the glasses. My sons absolutely loved one scene where Hal Jordan creates hot wheels style track and car, and the end of the move was literally filled with oohs and ahhs, but I can see some of this imagery could growing if watching this without 3D. I bought this in 3D bluray. This came with 2 additional discs, in addition to the 3D Bluray. The first of these a theatrical release of the movie on dvd in standard format, and the second is the extended version. I really can not see watching this without the 3D if you have a choice, so I have not, and will not be using either of these discs. There is also the option to download a digital copy of this to a phone or tablet free of charge. I have not done this yet, but may do so, when the children get their tablets for Christmas. The digital copy is not 3D but it might be nice to watch in the car or away from home. There are some special features on the disc - character bios, galleries, featurettes and picture in picture commentaries, but I never watch any of these - I bought this for the movie only. I ended up paying over the odds for this at £22 as Amazon had not been able to fulfil my earlier order and I wanted this for my sons birthday ( and then he took a month to get around to watching it). Prices have gone up since though, and new copies will cost £26 or more, and used copies form Amazon Marketplace run roughly £20. Although new copies are hard to find on their own, several retailers, including Tesco and Amazon are offering this in a triple pack at roughly £37 bundled with Clash Of The Titans and Journey 2 , but this is currently pre order only. It does seem the best value for money though. If I were reviewing the movie in a standard format, I think 3 stars would be quite generous, but in 3D, and taken as a family or child's movie, I do feel this earns a full a five stars. I don't even begrudge the fact that I paid over £20 for this. I expect this will be enjoyed many more times, and it did make for a wonderful movie night. If you will be watching this without, I would think of this more as a 4 star film and that only because of the 3D. As an adult who loved Geoff Johns graphic novel of Green Lantern, this just isn't as good as the book. Read the complete review |
|
|
Stanley Kubrick: Visionary Filmmaker Collection (Blu-ray)
by hogsflesh This Blu-ray set costs £26 on amazon, which is more than reasonable. This contains seven of Stanley Kubrick's films. Kubrick has a monumental reputation, which is largely deserved. The only disappointment with the set is that it doesn't include everything. A US set includes Spartacus and Dr Strangelove, which are oddly missing ... from this, and Paths of Glory and The Killing are also absent. Kubrick's films are often regarded as overlong; if this review feels the same way, perhaps you could think of it as an homage to its subject? ***Lolita (1962)*** This is based on Vladimir Nabokov's celebrated but controversial novel, and the promotional campaign for the film made a big thing of asking how they could possibly film Lolita. The answer, predictably enough for 1962, is 'cautiously'. The novel deals with a sexual relationship between a predatory literature professor and a 12-year-old girl. The film makes Lolita older - it's never stated in the film, but the DVD notes say she's meant to be 14. I'm not sure that 14 is that much better than 12, but I guess it must have seemed so at the time. Of course, there's no sex or nudity. It's still kind of disturbing, the way the nymphette Lolita's behaviour veers between childish and sexually precocious, but it's obviously meant to be disturbing. The novel - which everyone should read - is very funny, and Kubrick (working to a much-altered screenplay by Nabokov himself) heavily emphasises the comedy, probably because there wasn't much else to fill the film with when the eroticism was necessarily reduced. James Mason is superb as Humbert, giving probably his best ever performance. Shelley Winters is also magnificent as Lolita's mother, never quite letting herself suspect Humbert's real interest in her daughter. Sue Lyons is great as Lolita, sexy and mischievous and obviously desperate for a life that isn't dominated by sleazy older men. The weak link is Peter Sellers, who is irritating as Humbert's nemesis, Quilty. Kubrick used him to much better effect in Strangelove, but here he stammers nervously too often and isn't nearly as funny as we're meant to think he is. The story is a great example of how one must never achieve one's fondest desires, because they will inevitably let us down. The film treads a tightrope between making us laugh at Humbert and feel something like pity for him. This feels a lot edgier than the more obviously dark comedy in Strangelove (it's also laugh-out-loud funnier than Strangelove). It's the only black and white film in this boxset, and although well directed, Kubrick hasn't become the show-off of his later films. It wins extra points for the soundtrack - the 'ya-ya' track that introduces Lolita is a favourite of mine, while the pastiche of the slow movement from Rachmaninoff's Second Piano Concerto (as heard in Brief Encounter) is an amusingly ironic comment on this film's impossible romance. ***2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)*** The closest thing there is to an 'official' greatest film list has placed this at number 8, so the thought of writing anything sensible about it is a bit daunting. It's probably Kubrick's best film, and certainly the one on which much of his reputation rests. It was also the first big-budget science fiction film since the 1920s. The basic plot (co-written by Arthur C Clarke) is a bit of a sci-fi mainstay: aliens have been helping mankind's development over millions of years. This is an idea with a great deal of currency (Dr Who has used it at least five times), and found its apotheosis in the book Chariots of the Gods, which was popular in the 1970s. It's usually used for its uncanny effect, as in Quatermass and the Pit, but Kubrick here instils it with something like genuine awe. He takes pulp science fiction cliché and elevates it to the mythic. It begins in the stone age with apemen being visited by a black monolith which teaches them how to use weapons. Although the ape costumes are a bit silly (they're competent by the standards of the time), the film always seems realistic within its own terms. Rather charmingly, the apemen live with a herd of tapirs. I guess it's progress when they learn that beating a tapir to death with a bone gets them better food. I'm fond of tapirs, though, and wish that mankind had continued to live in peace with them. Then we zoom forward millions of years to the space odyssey part of the film. (It's a long film, at two and a half hours, but never outstays its welcome. It has a rhythm all of its own.) Famously, there are many, many lengthy shots of spaceships moving slowly through space, often accompanied by the Blue Danube by Strauss. It is a slow film - when coming back from making myself a cup of tea, I didn't notice that the film was still paused for a few seconds. It has some of the most beautiful shot compositions in film history, and the slow moving, lengthy shots make it perfect for people on drugs, as does the incredible star gate sequence at the film's climax. It only occasionally looks dated, with perhaps the final sequences in the white room being the only part that doesn't quite come off. The story isn't a complex as it's made out to be, but Kubrick's refusal to spell it out has caused people problems over the years. There's little expository dialogue, and the use of music further distances us. The music - the classical pieces, anyway - seems to comment on what we're seeing rather than underlining it. His use of music is probably the most easily imitable, and therefore influential, of Kubrick's innovations. The performances are a little bland, probably reflecting the sterile environment of the film, but Keir Dullea is fine as the tightly buttoned astronaut hero. Douglas Rain gives the best performance, as the ship's computer, HAL 9000, and Leonard Rossiter's in it. This was hugely successful at the time - you can't imagine a modern sci fi blockbuster ending in the way this one does and still packing them in. This is probably the best film in the set, even though it isn't quite my favourite. ***A Clockwork Orange (1971)*** This is another film that it is very difficult to be objective about. For people of my age, this was the coolest film ever made, for the very simple reason that we couldn't see it. Warners withdrew it from UK circulation a few years after its release, apparently at Kubrick's insistence, and we had to wait for his death before it was made available again. I'd read the novel, read about it in books, seen evocative stills. Eventually, I acquired a third or fourth generation VHS copy, and loved it (I was hardly not going to love it). But it wasn't until it came out on DVD that I was finally able to appreciate what a visually stunning film it is. It tells of the brutal crime spree of Alex and his friends as they rape and beat up anyone who crosses their path. Sent to prison, Alex volunteers for a technique to 'cure' him of his evil ways. This leaves him a lot worse off, and at the mercy of his previous victims. It's based on Anthony Burgess's novel, but weirdly misses out the book's crucial final chapter. This does make for a slightly unsatisfactory ending to the film. It was vastly controversial in its day, perhaps more so than any other film released in the 70s. Most of the stuff that stirred up trouble takes place in the first 20 minutes, with two more hours to go afterwards. The violence is still nasty at times, and one rape scene certainly tips over into exploitation (the one in the empty theatre, not the Singin' in the Rain one). But the film is more a black comedy than a horror movie. It has an oddly ironic distance from its own events, and the story is essentially a fable. It's just unbelievably thrilling from beginning to end, in the sense that you will rarely see a film that is crafted more perfectly, but without losing its sense of energy. It also contains one of the greatest performances in any film: Malcolm McDowell is simply incredible as Alex, a spiteful child in an adult's body, amused by his own naughtiness and sneering at the world. He makes him disturbingly likable. There are also great performances from Warren Clark as one of Alex's henchmen, and, especially, Patrick Magee as the writer victimised by the gang, who gets to take his revenge. Burgess's stroke of genius in the book is to make the teens of this world the opposite of teens in the real word - they use Russian rather than American slang, and listen to Beethoven rather than pop music. The iconic bowler hat and cricket whites costumes are a convincing attempt to create a teen subculture, and the amazing synthesised classical music by Walter Carlos is iconic and completely appropriate. I'm not sure if this is meant to be set in the future or not. The fantastically well-chosen locations, including the ghastly Thamesmead, look like some nightmare gone-wrong future, but the record store includes copies of Magical Mystery Tour and Atom Heart Mother, apparently on vinyl. And the prison governor has a 1970 Wisden on his desk. These and more details are now obvious thanks to HD - Alex gives his surname as 'DeLarge' to the prison guards, but in the newspaper reports it's given as 'Burgess'. An odd continuity error. Not that it matters. This is one of my all-time favourite films, one of the few legendary cult movies that completely lives up to its reputation. Unfortunately, after A Clockwork Orange, the quality of the films drastically falls off. ***Barry Lyndon (1975)*** This is a period drama adapted from a Thackeray novel. It tells of the misadventures of an Irishman in the time of George III who fights a duel for love, gets caught up in the Seven Years War, becomes a professional gambler, marries above his station and eventually comes a-cropper. Kubrick's films are always lengthy affairs, but this one is a buttock-numbing three hours, and you feel every minute. There are two main problems. The first is that the tone is far too heavy and tragic. I haven't read the novel, but it feels like it was probably told with a lightness that the film is missing. The voiceover narration imparts a bit of ironic distance to the story, but it still feels like it is taking itself far too seriously. (The narration is by Michael Hordern; this also has the unfortunate effect of making it feel a bit like an episode of Paddington Bear.) It's fundamentally a rollicking picaresque tale in the style of Tom Jones, but with more of a (Victorian) moral to it. Kubrick has decided for whatever reason to treat it as high tragedy, however comical individual moments might be. The other major problem is Ryan O'Neill, who plays Barry. He looks exactly right, but his acting is not very demonstrative. He ends up feeling like a big blank space at the centre of his own film. His performance is exactly the same, whether he's a young soldier tossed on the whims of fortune or a callous husband trying to buy his way into the aristocracy. Happily there are good points. The supporting cast, without exception, are superb. They include many Kubrick regulars (Leonard Rossiter, Patrick Magee, Philip Stone) and other terrific British character actors (Andre Morell, Murray Melvin). There's good use of classical music again, including a nicely portentous Handel piece used as the opening and closing theme. The film looks absolutely lovely, of course. It's all lit by natural light or candlelight, giving it an authentic look missing from most costume drama. Shots are composed and lit to make them look like paintings. While this is marvellous, and just about serves to get the viewer to the finish line, it does sort of feel like that's all it really has - like Kubrick made it purely because of the visual effects he wanted to achieve, rather than because it was a story that particularly needed telling on screen. The film's reputation has risen over the years - this tends to be true of all the later Kubrick efforts - but I can't help but feel that that is wishful thinking. ***The Shining (1980)*** This is a film of two halves, one good and one less so. Based on one of Stephen King's best novels, this tells the story of wannabe writer Jack who acts as winter caretaker for a posh hotel, taking his wife and son with him. The hotel was built on an old Indian burial ground, of course, and is haunted. As in the book, Jack's own emotional problems combine with the supernatural presence in the hotel to put everyone's lives in danger. The film has a better, more intelligent ending than the book's. Unfortunately, though, the second half rather lets it down. The first half is genuinely creepy, with those amazing steadicam shots stalking little Danny as he zooms round the corridors on his trike. The briefly glimpsed little girl ghosts and brilliant use of ambient sound raise the tension to occasionally unbearable levels. The problem is that when then horror bursts out towards the end, it is inevitably disappointing. The crone in the bath has terrible makeup, and the blood gushing out of the lifts (a shot we see over and over again) looks silly. The guy dressed as a dog (or bear, or whatever) giving another guy a blowjob is hilarious, but I'm not sure what purpose it serves. The performances suffer from the same problem. The kid is good, but Jack Nicholson is disappointing. He starts very well, adding to the unease immeasurably, playing a man devoid of warmth who seems to inspire fear in his family. He simmers away for the first half, making us genuinely scared of what he'll do when he explodes. But unfortunately he goes so far over the top in the second half that really, all you can do is laugh - perhaps that was the intended reaction. But this is the point where the best Hollywood actor of the 70s transforms into the grinning cliché of the 80s. Shelley Duvall as his put upon wife isn't much better, being whiny and irritating throughout (not that there's much else she could do with the part). The supporting cast, including Scatman Crothers and Philip Stone, are better, but aren't around long enough to rescue the film from the excesses of its stars. It's lovely to look at, of course, and you can't fault the technical precision with which it was made - this is perhaps where the criticisms of Kubrick as a distant director, more interested in visuals than people, take hold. That one photo of Jack Nicholson poking his face through a door has become better known than the film itself, which while not bad exactly, is monstrously overrated. ***Full Metal Jacket (1987)*** This is perhaps the most frustrating film in the set, as the first half is as good as anything Kubrick did, but the second plummets in quality. It's a Vietnam movie, following the fortunes of new recruit Joker as he goes through Marine Corp training and ends up working as a combat reporter during the Tet Offensive. The first 40 minutes, showing the dehumanisation of the recruits as they're turned into killers, is absolutely superb. R Lee Ermey, playing the brutal drill instructor, Sgt Hartman, is incredibly good (he was a real drill instructor, and was allowed to improvise a lot of his dialogue - presumably this is a fairly realistic representation of how he trained marines). Hartman focuses in on the hapless, slightly overweight Pvt Lawrence, bullying him remorselessly. Even the initially affable Joker becomes thuggishly unpleasant, joining in with bullying Lawrence. Unfortunately, the film then goes to Vietnam. Or rather it doesn't - famously, the movie was shot in England, with most of the combat scenes shot at an abandoned gas works in Beckton. It doesn't seem at all tropical, and the sky just looks British. Perhaps this wouldn't be a problem if the film itself was compelling, but it isn't. It just becomes another Vietnam film, with the usual esprit de corps, raw recruits getting blooded, and small but fatal skirmishes. We've seen it all before, and better, in Platoon which was made by a real war veteran in a real jungle. The performances are all great, although inevitably it's Ermey who makes the biggest impact. Matthew Modine is a likeable hero in the second half of the film. It's shot with Kubrick's usual precision, but has nothing like the flair or impact of 2001 or Clockwork Orange. There's a good selection of 60s pop tunes, as there always is in Vietnam movies. Thankfully no Doors. ***Eyes Wide Shut (1999)*** And that brings us to Kubrick's last film, Eyes Wide Shut. And what a sorry piece of work it is. A married doctor responds badly to his wife telling him about a sexual fantasy that doesn't involve him, so he goes out in search of adventure. He ends up at a wild high class orgy where everyone wears a mask, and then seems to get followed around by sinister people. The film, sadly, is just boring. There's some trying-too-hard acting from Tom Cruise, who is presumably attempting to up his game because he's working for a Great Director, but who just resorts to rubbing his face and sighing a lot (a typical trick of actors who feel out of their depth; see also Tom Hardy in Tinker Tailor, or Brad Pitt in Babel). Cruise's then-wife Nicole Kidman plays his onscreen wife, and does quite a lot of nudity, but her part is too slight to really be worthy of her talents. The story itself doesn't add up to much. The script is embarrassingly bad (the supposedly suave European who makes a pass at Kidman early on should be held up as a salutary example of how not to write a character). Since Kubrick's death there have been attempts made to rehabilitate the film's reputation, probably because no one wants Kubrick to have gone out on such a bum note, but the best argument its supporters can make is 'oh, the detractors don't get it', which is always a sign of desperation. The saddest part is that it doesn't feel exceptional in any way. Even at his worst, Kubrick could still compose shots brilliantly; you feel you're watching something exceptional, even in the weaker films. Pretty much anyone could have directed this, or so it feels. The orgy scene is kind of funny, but the hours either side of it are boring. ***Blu-rays, extras*** The films all look good on Blu-ray, with Clockwork Orange and 2001 seeming to benefit most from the HD upgrade. There are details in both films I'd never noticed before. Barry Lyndon still looks quite soft and blurry, but that's the intended effect of the way the film was shot, so it's commendable they didn't try to sharpen it. Eyes Wide Shut is perhaps the most disappointing, but that's probably because I can see improvements in all the other films, but not so much in that one. This is likely to be down to its being the most recent of the films. Lolita and Lyndon have no extras apart from a trailer. But all the other films have loads of extras - too many really. Certainly too many for me to list them all in a review that's already overlong. There seems to be a feeling that, in order to do Kubrick justice, the extras need to be almost overpowering. There are a few worth checking out, though. The commentary on 2001, by two of the actors, is largely dull - they have an awful lot of film to talk over, after all - but there are some interesting bits about how certain effects sequences were done. The Clockwork Orange extras include a pretty good Malcolm McDowell commentary. There's a good 'making of' on The Shining, which mostly consists of behind the scenes footage shot by Kubrick's daughter. This is interesting, as we see Kubrick and the actors at work. Nicholson comes across as friendly, Shelley Duvall as neurotic. Kubrick himself seems grumpy. But this is a fascinating glimpse into the world of filmmaking, even if the film in question isn't so great. I'm baffled by the presence of James Mason in full period costume chatting to Jack Nicholson in one shot, though - he must have been filming something nearby. There's also an extra disk (from the Clockwork Orange release judging by the menu screen) which contains a good two-hour documentary about Kubrick. This includes contributions from friends and family as well as most of the surviving lead actors from his films. It goes all the way back to his childhood, so covers the films that weren't included in the set. This disk also has a 90-minute documentary about Malcolm McDowell, which is OK. He's a likeable guy, I guess, but anyone hoping to see some clips from Caligula will be sorely disappointed. There's also a rather pointless little book with a few photos in it, but it doesn't really add value to the set. For the price you can't go wrong with this. Of the seven films, only one is downright bad, even if a couple of others are disappointing. High definition suits Kubrick very well, and this is an essential purchase if you have a Blu-ray player. Read the complete review |
|
|
Downfall (Blu-ray)
by Oktavist The movie depicts the last ten days spent by Hitler in his bunker, trying to sort the war in a way. What is interesting about this movie is that it isn't just another Hitler movie,like tons and tons of other,with suppositions on what it could've happened back then. It starts with the statement of Traudl Junge, Hitler's most ... youngest secretary. This aids in creating an image of credibility around the story. Traudl Junge is the main actor of this film, and the movie revolves around her, her emotions are felt throughout the movie. When watching the movie, we "see" with her eyes, feel what she felt. Hitler's days were numbered. The Russian army was invading Germany,reaching Berlin. In the bunker, Hitler made some completely irrational moves, rendering entire armies useless. One of the field marshals said :"The Fuhrer has lost all sense of reality.He is moving divisions that no longer exist. Steiner's army was dissipated, yet Steiner must attack,this is madness!" What struck me was the loyalty of Hitler's men. Although they knew that there is nothing they could possibly do, they didn't work Hitler behind his back, they just stood there, defending what's left to defend. Another scene that moves me is when Hitler is finally informed that Steiner's army is unable to do anything.He then asks everybody to leave,except four of his commanders. He then proceeds to launching a tirade against his commanders. You could really feel Hitler's anger, the shame of the commanders, the crowd outside feeling remorseful. There are just some of the movie parts. What I found later is that the movie has some deleted scenes. For example, when Krebs,one of the commanders, tries to negotiate with Chuikov, the Russian commander. The movie shows Krebs walking the streets accompanied by some men, and then skips to him talking to Chuikov.Another deleted scene is when some Russian ladies enter the bunker and find the bodies of Krebs and Burgdorf, another commander. There are just some of the deleted scenes. Nonetheless, those scene don't add important details regarding the story. The movie ends with the German soldiers throwing their weapons,surrendering. The ending also shows the struggle of Traudl, who walks past the Russians, not being able to stand them. She is helped by a boy, who she leaves with. Overall, the movie is worth watching.It is one of the movies I enjoy the most.I can't even remember how many times I watched it. Read the complete review |
Blu-Ray Movie |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Parental Guidance / Blu-Ray Movie / Director: Steven Spielberg / Actors: Christian Bale, Miranda Richardson, John Malkovich ... / Blu-ray released 2012-11-05 at Warner Home Video |
|
|
Genre: Drama / Blu-Ray Movie / Parental Guidance / Director: David Lean / Actors: Omar Sharif, Julie Christie, Geraldine Chaplin, Rod Steiger, Alec Guinness ... / Blu-ray released 2010-05-10 at Warner Home Video / Features of the Blu-ray: Import, Blu-ray, Widescreen |
|
|
Genre: Comedy / Blu-Ray Movie / Suitable for 15 years and over / Director: Matthias Hoene / Actors: Michelle Ryan, Georgia King, Harry Treadaway ... / Blu-ray released 2012-10-22 at studiocanal |
|
|
1 review Genre: Children's DVDs - Disney / Blu-Ray Movie / Parental Guidance / Director: Mark Andrews, Brenda Chapman / Actors: Kelly Macdonald, Billy Connolly, Emma Thompson ... / Blu-ray released 2012-11-26 at Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment |
|
|
Genre: Children's DVDs - Animation / Blu-Ray Movie / Universal, suitable for all / Director: Sarah Smith / Actors: James McAvoy, Bill Nighy, Hugh Laurie, Jim Broadbent, Imelda Staunton ... / Blu-ray released 2012-11-19 at Sony Pictures Home Ent. / Features of the Blu-ray: Subtitled |
|
|
Genre: Drama / Blu-Ray Movie / Suitable for 15 years and over / Director: Nikolaj Arcel / Actors: Mads Mikkelsen ... / Blu-ray released 2012-10-29 at Metrodome Distribution / Features of the Blu-ray: PAL |
|
|
To Be Announced / Blu-Ray Movie / Director: Len Wiseman / Actors: Colin Farrell, Kate Beckinsale, Bryan Cranston ... / Blu-ray released 2012-12-26 at Sony Pictures Home Ent UK / Features of the Blu-ray: Subtitled |
|
|
Genre: Science Fiction & Fantasy - Science Fiction / Blu-Ray Movie / Suitable for 18 years and over / Actors: Sylvester Stallone ... / Blu-ray released 2012-09-17 at Warner Home Video |
|
|
Genre: Children's DVDs / Blu-Ray Movie / Universal, suitable for all / Blu-ray released 2007-11-26 at Warner Home Video |
|
|
Genre: Children's DVDs / Blu-Ray Movie / Parental Guidance / Blu-ray released 2009-11-02 at Universal Pictures UK |
|
| Blu-Ray Movie recommendations 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... back next | ||
| dooyoo Results 131 - 140 of 1039 | ||










