|
Newest Review: ... irrelevant in real world images The question is which one to get. Each one is compromise over weight, speed, and price, to ... more More Canon camera lenses
|
||
Price Comparison for Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Zoom Lens
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Lens
Last Update 01.12.2009 05:49
|
£ 493.00 |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
Read Reviews for Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM ...
by - written on 09/09/07
Rating:
It has the latest optical design that gives a minimum focusing distatnce at 1.2m and 0.21x maximum magnification.And the best of all is that the prize isn't so high.I think that this product is great !
by - written on 18/08/07 (Very useful, 504 readings)
Rating:
A 70-200 telephoto is "standard kit" for many photographers, which is why Canon have four models at this focal length.(F4, F4 IS, F2.8 and F2.8 IS) (IS = Image stabilised) There's little point in talking about the F4 without comparing it to the others. All 4 have superb image quality, some say the F4 is sharper than the 2.8 IS (My 2.8 IS is very slightly sharper than my F4 so who knows) either way all of them are stonkingly good from 70-200, from wide open. If you measurebate you might spot some differences but they will be irrelevant in real world images The question is which one to get. Each one is compromise over ... Read the complete review
by - written on 08/03/07 (Very useful, 564 readings)
Rating:
General Overview and Performance The Canon EOS Lens 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM, is promoted as a high performance telephoto zoom lens providing excellent performance for all general purposes. It is a very lightweight (0.705kg) and compact zoom lens that has the same level of optical performance as EF 70 - 200mm f/2.8L USM. This assures good portability and operability and makes it an excellent choice for travel photography as well as more localised shoots. I have used it for taking pictures of landscapes, natural habitats, portraiture, curious happenings in supermaket carparks and the usual espionage work. The results so far have been more than satisfactory and it seems ... Read the complete review
| Processing/Quality: | Reliability: | ||
| Ease of use: | Picture quality: | ||
| Battery life: |





