Welcome! Log in or Register

Nikon F3.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S DX

  • image
£1.62 Best Offer by: amazon.co.uk marketplace See more offers
1 Review

Manufacturer: Nikon / Type: Zoom Lens

  • Sort by:

    * Prices may differ from that shown

  • Write a review >
    How do you rate the product overall? Rate it out of five by clicking on one of the hearts.
    What are the advantages and disadvantages? Use up to 10 bullet points.
    Write your reviews in your own words. 250 to 500 words
    Number of words:
    Write a concise and readable conclusion. The conclusion is also the title of the review.
    Number of words:
    Write your email adress here Write your email adress

    Your dooyooMiles Miles

    1 Review
    Sort by:
    • More +
      01.06.2010 19:22
      Very helpful
      (Rating)
      3 Comments

      Advantages

      Disadvantages

      Not worth it

      I'd like to point out before starting this review that the spring deal located under the product heading is actually for a different lens - this product is the 18-135mm, whereas the one linked is the 18-55mm.

      I originally acquired this lens in 2007 when I bought my first DSLR (a Nikon D80) and knew nothing about the infamous kit lens (ie. don't buy them, they're not good).

      Things to note about this lens:
      - It is a DX this means it is made for cropped sensor cameras (so not the D700, D3 etc.) You can still use it on a full frame camera, but the results will defeat the point of having a full frame camera in the first place.
      - Plastic body
      - Switch on the side of the lens for alternating between manual and automatic focus.
      - Another note for those new to the world of DSLR's and photography - this is a Nikon lens which means it has been made to fit on Nikon bodies, it will not fit on a Canon etc.
      - As with all lenses, this one comes with a lens cap. I have a habit of losing these but I am happy to report that replacements are widely available for just a couple of pounds.

      Tip:
      - If you do buy this lens or any other you will need to protect the glass - consider doing this by using the lens hood provided (which also helps to get rid of sun glare) or invest in a UV filter which screws onto the front of the lens.

      At this present moment in time (June 2010) the lens is available to buy from jessops for £309. Many of you may be thinking it's alot of money and yes it is, but not in the world of lenses. For a lens £309 is actually at the bottom end of the price range and it will soon become clear why this lens is the price it is.

      The plastic body gives it a cheap feel and the lens doesn't look or feel very durable. In the (less than) 3 years that I've had it the zoom mechanism has gone a bit iffy - if I'm shooting looking down and take my hand off the barrel of the lens, the effect of gravity makes it zoom itself outwards and this shouldn't happen, but because it's a cheaply made lens, it wears very quickly.

      Glass is all important in the construction of lenses - different glasses have different faults and lenses tend to use several different bits of glass to counteract each others faults, thus resulting in a better quality image. One major issue is that poor quality glass can cause something known as chromatic abberation - this is where you get coloured fringes around the edges of objects in a photograph (often purple/pink but can be blue etc.) This lens has chromatic abberation in abundance - almost every shot I take with it, if I zoom in close and have a proper look, will have fringing somewhere in the photo. Fringing does get worse/more apparant when there are extremes of contrast.

      This lens is F3.5-5.6 which is pretty standard for a zoom lens ie. not particularly fast. While this isn't necessarily a bad thing, it will restrict certain useage for example it means it isn't really a suitable lens for shooting weddings (low light) or sports coverage.

      I have to say it's not all bad though - this was my first lens and although I have others, this is still the most versatile one I own. It has taught me alot since I've had it(although mostly how it isn't a professional quality lens), making me a much better photographer. That said what it has taught me has made me come to hate it and I am looking forward to the day when I can afford to replace it with the Nikkor 24-70mm and leave so many issues with image quality behind me. When that day comes I will gladly sell this lens and not feel one bit of guilt about it.

      Overall I would not recommend this lens - yes it's 18-135mm range means it's very versatile for shooting many different subjects, but the trade off with quality just isn't worth it. Save yourself money in the long run and buy a better lens - don't get sucked into the kit lens deal like I did. Always do your research before making a purchase like a lens or camera or there's a good chance you'll waste your money.

      If you want a cheap but good quality Nikon lens consider the 50mm 1.8 - it's got a fixed focal length so much more restrictive in that sense, but it gives much higher image quality, is faster and less than £100 to buy new. It's the cheapest, best quality lens you'll ever buy.

      Comments

      Login or register to add comments