Welcome! Log in or Register

Pentax SMC P-DA J

  • image
1 Review
  • Sort by:

    * Prices may differ from that shown

  • Write a review >
    How do you rate the product overall? Rate it out of five by clicking on one of the hearts.
    What are the advantages and disadvantages? Use up to 10 bullet points.
    Write your reviews in your own words. 250 to 500 words
    Number of words:
    Write a concise and readable conclusion. The conclusion is also the title of the review.
    Number of words:
    Write your email adress here Write your email adress

    Your dooyooMiles Miles

    1 Review
    Sort by:
    • More +
      24.07.2012 16:46
      Very helpful
      (Rating)

      Advantages

      Disadvantages

      Good lens with a few minor quibbles

      This lens is a great upgrade to the kit lens, the 18-55 f3.5-5.6, and has a similar topline - slightly wider and quite a bit less telephoto, which is a shame, as the 45mm (67.5mm equivalent) just doesn't feel quite long enough for a standard zoom - for example, portraits are a little too wide or else you get unflattering widening of features if you fill the frame.

      The lens feels reasonably well built, slightly dry feeling zoom ring and focus ring which make small adjustments a little tricky, and the lens is quite light which gives it a slightly cheap feel when compared with Pentax's DA* lenses.

      As a general purpose lens with an emphasis on capturing a little more of a scene in wides, this lens is great, and image quality is a substantial step up from the kit lens. Aberrations are ok, on larger prints or crops you'll see quite a bit of sharpness fall off and curvature and chromatic aberration, particularly at 16mm and wider apertures.

      The motor drive autofocus is quite fast, but noisy, and the quick shift function is useful as you can get the lens in the right ballpark then let the camera's autofocus tweak it for tricky subjects.

      Compared to the alternatives, Pentax's own DA* 16-50mm f2.8 and DA 17-70mm f4, the older 16-45mm f4 is much cheaper and for a more modest telephoto end gives you that slightly punchier wide angle. The 16-50mm also has SDM autofocus, which is quieter but has been associated with failure issues.

      Comments

      Login or register to add comments