Welcome! Log in or Register

Alfa Romeo 145 in general

  • image
4 Reviews
  • Write a review >
    How do you rate the product overall? Rate it out of five by clicking on one of the hearts.
    What are the advantages and disadvantages? Use up to 10 bullet points.
    Write your reviews in your own words. 250 to 500 words
    Number of words:
    Write a concise and readable conclusion. The conclusion is also the title of the review.
    Number of words:
    Write your email adress here Write your email adress

    Your dooyooMiles Miles

    4 Reviews
    Sort by:
    • More +
      29.09.2001 17:06

      Advantages

      Disadvantages

      a good car but this would not be my first choice.if u wanna take my advice go 4 a big BMW!!! - Advantages: looks good, quite big, goes fast - Disadvantages: bit plasticy

      Comments

      Login or register to add comments
    • More +
      24.11.2000 01:00
      4 Comments

      Advantages

      Disadvantages

      Love of loath the looks, the 145 was the first sign that Alfa was becoming adventurous. The 155 was OK looking, but boxy, the 164 sleek but not radical. But look where Alfa has got to now - 156 - wow! 166 - wow GTV, yep - and wait for the Alfa 147. Well it all started here. Fiat group obviously had this thing in the early 90's about using the same floor pan for 3 and 5 door options - Brava and Bravo for example. Here it was 145 and 146. Also, they always think that 3 door buyers are less conservative in their tastes. The 146 is a neat little saloon, but the 145 - although common from the A posts forward - was altogether a bit more stylish. Big front doors are followed by a slight upturned kink in the window line before a cut off rear end. The rear window dips where the wiper is based (centrally) - and Ford have copied this EXACTLY on the Focus - check it out. Some say this looks like a bread van (my wife included - she has a 146), I really like it - there again I like the 147, she doesn't. There again I like ANYTHING Alfa, she is more discerning! The car is actually a lot bigger than you think - this is no Punto/Fiesta sized supermini, but a full-blown Escort rival. It is as wide as a 155 (I've checked parkers) and the internal space is just about the same, amazingly. Boot space suffers a bit, as this is a touch shorter than the 146. The range started with the old boxer engines. Unfortunately, this wonderful engine was a touch past its sell by date (it first appeared in the very early 70s). It was fully fuel injected and had the now obligatory 16 valves, but until the 145 was fitted with the glorious twin sparks (how DO Alfa do it), the car never really took off here. Even then it didn't much of course, but it is much more desirable second hand than old Alfas, and holds value better 9which isn't saying much) The range is still on sale, though not for much longer as the 147 arrives in Jan
      uary - the 147 is dispensing with the twin body styles and will add a 5-door version to the 3 door later next year. Engines are 1.6 (120bhp), 1.8 (144 bhp) and 2.0 (155). Earlier versions are a touch less powerful and less Torquay. The 1.8 in particular is a very good buy in this car (it is actually a 1747cc, so amazingly powerful). It costs quite a bit less, is more economic of course and usually drops the car one insurance class (insurance is typically group 13 to 15!). The 1.6 still goes well, though is geared lower to compensate for a higher peak torque point. It is amazingly economic though - returning 30+ around town. All engines are 16 valve, and are Twin Sparks where each cylinder has two spark plugs, the second, smaller one, firing on the exhaust stroke to clean up emissions primarily - presumably allowing the engines to run a little dirtier and more powerfully on the main stroke in the first place. Sounds expensive, but the plugs last 60,000 miles. Servicing is now 12,000 miles and is not extensive - just £80 for my first service at an Alfa garage. All engines rev so beautifully all the way up the range, red lining at 7,000 rpm. They don't falter and never seem to run out of power - Jeremy Clarkson said (whilst pouring scorn on the 2.4 JTD diesel), "what is the point of an Alfa engine that runs out of steam at 4,000 rpm 9the diesel) when all other engines are gathering themselves together for a glorious assault on the upper reaches of the rev band" (or something along those lines!) Get the picture? The 2.0 litre is even better in that it gets counterbalancing shafts too. Unlike the 146, the 145 top of the range 2 litre gets a better hot hatch treatment in the Cloverleaf format. Still quite understated, but with body coloured sill extensions, roof lip spoiler, green cloverleaf crests... All 145s now come with good equipment - 4 airbags for example, but the interiors are not the strong point. Al
      fa did not produce a RH drive version of their third generation interior, which is markedly better. Instruments are OK, though a bit limited for an Alfa, but the central dash is big. Flat and quite ugly. In front of the passenger the whole dash is cut away, giving a lot more space, but make the glove box a sock box down by the passenger's feet - and so tiny too. Enough of the interior - Which? Said it lacked storage space! Well I'm glad if which readers won't buy it because of that! Engines aside, it handles well, though the car seems slightly tall. Steering is fantastic- the best set up you'll find anywhere with the now legendary (well...) fast rack steering taking just 2 turns lock to lock (most cars take 3 minimum). The wheel is small because the power steering assistance has to be great. The steering lacks quite the full feel of the older set up, but its responsiveness makes up for it 9reportedly this is better on the 147) So, all in all a practical, stylish, sporting alternative - as Alfas always have been. Thankfully they are starting to make cars properly - though in the 145 not up to top German or Japanese standards. They certainly style them better and better, and they also show no sign at all of being capable of producing anything less than the best engines around.

      Comments

      Login or register to add comments
      • More +
        15.11.2000 15:21
        Very helpful
        (Rating)
        6 Comments

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Love of loath the looks, the 145 was the first sign that Alfa was becoming adventurous. The 155 was Ok looking, but boxy, the 164 sleek but not radical. But look where Alfa have got to now - 156 - wow! 166 - wow(ish) GTV, yep - and wait for the ALfa147. well it all started here. Fiat group obviously had this thing in the early 90's about using the sam floor pan for 3 and 5 door options - Brava and Bravo for example. here it was 145 and 146. Also, they always think that 3 door buyers are less conservative in their tastes. The 146 was a neat little saloon, but the 145 - although common from the A posts forward - was altogether a bit more stylish. big front doors are followed by a slight upturned kink in the window line before a cut off rear end. The rear window dips where the wiper is based (centrally) - and Ford have copied this EXACTLY on the Focus - check it out. Some say this looks like a breadvan (my wife included - she has a 146), I really like it - there again I like the 147, she doesn't. there again I like ANYTHING Alfa, she is more discerning! The car is actually a lot bigger than you think - this is no Punto/Fiesta sized supermini, but a full blown Escort rival. It is as wide as a 155 (I've checked parkers) and the internal space is just about the same, amazingly. Boot space suffers a bit as this is a tocuh shorter than the 146. The range started with the old boxer engines. Unfortunately, this wonderful engine was a tocuh past its sell by date (it forst appeared in a sud in the very early 70s). It was fully fuel injected and had the now obligatory 16 valves, but until the 145 was fitted with the glorious twin sparks (how DO alfa do it), the car never really took off here. Even then it didn't much of course, but it is much more desirable second hand than old Alfas, and holds valiue better 9which isn't saying much) The range is stil on sale, though not for much longer as
        the 147 arrives in January - the 147 is dispensing with the twin body styles and will add a 5 door version to the 3 door later next year. Engines are 1.6 (120bhp), 1.8 (144 bhp) and 2.0 (155). Earlier versions are a tocuh less powerful and less torquey. The 1.8 in particular is a very good buy in this car (it is actually a 1747cc, so amazingly poweful). It costs quite a bit less, is more economic of course and usually drops the car one insurance class (insurance is typically group 13 to 15!). The 1.6 still goes well, though is geared lower to compensate for a higher peak torque point. It is amazingly economic though - returning 30+ around town. All engines are 16 valve, and are Twin Sparks where each cylinder has two spark plugs, the second, smaller one, firing on teh exhaust stroke to clean up emissions primarily - presumably allowing the engines to run a little dirtier and more powerfully on the main stroke in the first place. Sounds expensive, but the plugs last 60,000 miles. Servicing is now 12,000 miles and is not extensive - just £80 for my first service at an Alfa garage. All engines rev so beatifully all the way up the range, red lining at 7,000 rpm. They don't falter and never seem to run out of power - Jeremy Clarkson said (whilst pouring scorn on the 2.4 JTD diesel), "what is the point of an Alfa engine that runs out of steam at 4,000 rpm 9the diesel) when all other engines are gathering themsleves togther for a glorious assault on the upper reaches of the rev band" (or somethign along those lines!) Get the picture? The 2.0 litre is even better in that it gets counterbalancing shafts too. Unlike the 146, the 145 top of the range 2 litregets a better hot hatch treatment in the Cloverleaf format. Still quite understated, but with body coloured sill extensions, roof lip spolier, green cloverleaf crests... All 145s now come with good equipment - 4 airbags for example, but the interiors are
        not the strong point. Alfa did not produce a RH drive version of their third generation interior which is markedly better. Instruments are OK, though a bit limited for an Alfa, but th central dash is big. flat and quite ugly. In front of the passeger the whole dash is cut away, giving a lot more space, but make the glove box a sock box down by the passenger's feet - and so tiny too. Enough of the interior - Which? said it lacked storage space! Well I'm glad if which readers won't buy it because of that! Engines aside, it handles well, though the car seems slightly tall. Steering is fantastic- the best set up you'll find anywhere with the now legendary (well...) fast rack steering taking just 2 turns lock to lock (most cars take 3 minimum). The wheel is small because the power steering assistance has to be great. The steering lacks quite the full feel of the older set up, but its responsivenes smakes up for it 9reportedly this is better on the 147) So, all in all a practical, stylish, sporting alternative - as Alfas always have been. Thankfully they are starting to make cars properly - though in the 145 not up to top German or Japanese standards. They certainly style them better and better, and they also show no sign at all of being capable of producing anything less than the best engines around.

        Comments

        Login or register to add comments
        • More +
          03.09.2000 01:13
          Very helpful
          (Rating)
          1 Comment

          Advantages

          Disadvantages

          The Alfa Romeo 145 Cloverleaf. Very fast 2 litre 16v engine, variable valve tech, 8 spark plugs, distinctive look, very spacious inside... so what's the problem? Yep, its the dealers. They either don't know how to fix things on the car, or when they do, they charge twice the price on parts and labour of an independent garage - and thats if you can find a dealership that's local. Although if you do end up at one - whilst they scratch their heads checking your car - it does give you a chance to wander round eyeing up your next alfa, because despite all you'll want another one !! I've had two 145s so far, first a 145 1.7 16v boxer. This was pretty good really, but very very thirsty. So I traded up to a cloverleaf 3 years ago. Overall its done well. Its very economical on petrol for a 2 litre 16v, its comfortable on long journeys, and has very quick steering like all modern alfas. Mine's a metallic plum colour which does look rather strange but I still get people coming up saying they love the car so it can't be too bad I guess. Overall its better than most cars, but a bit quirky. If you want a car that you don't have to think or worry about then maybe its not for you. On the other hand if you want something just a little bit different then go for it (or wait till the 147 is out later in 2001).

          Comments

          Login or register to add comments