Home > Motors > Car >

Reviews for Alfa Romeo GTV 3.0 V6 24V


VROOOOOOOOM! -  Alfa Romeo GTV 3.0 V6 24V Car
Alfa Romeo GTV 3.0 V6 24V 

Newest Review: ... what driving's all about? A real character from the old school. One of the best things (apart from the noise)is the throttle response - t... more

More Alfa Romeo card     

VROOOOOOOOM! (Alfa Romeo GTV 3.0 V6 24V)

fitznstarts

Member Name: fitznstarts

Product:

Alfa Romeo GTV 3.0 V6 24V

Date: 11/06/01 (2355 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: noise, pace

Disadvantages: size, slightly aging looks

I actually own a 156 1.8 Sport, but if you have ready my op on that, you will know that it has not been problem-free.

After a replacement dashboard, gearbox and driveshaft I was getting disappointed and told the garage so quite clearly. They made it up to me on the first service. Four days in a 3.0 V6 GTV by way of an apology.

I live in the Chilterns and the opportunities to drive this wonderful car in the crisp Autumn last year were outstanding.

Everything that's already been written is true. The cabin is small (if nicely laid out in leather), the rear seats are low-slung shelves and the boot is two thirds full of a full sized spare tyre.

What the heck, when you get the rev needle up around 7,000 it's so willing and the noise is outstanding. You'll be heading for every underpass and bridge you can find with the windows open just to hear the wonderful near 200 bhp growling like a pent up lion.

Fuel economy is pretty rotten when driven hard, but I'm used to that from my Alfa. However, you do have to realise that you are sitting in a car the size of a Ford Fiesta with two of its engines under the bonnet. If you want decent fuel economy drive slowly, or get a Fiesta!

I'll say that the looks are beginning to fade now. With the Elise, Honda S2000, Vauxhall and Z3 all chipping at it's feet, it's probably time for the tallented designers to have another go.

For £30,000 you get into TVR territory but you have English build quality rather than Italian to worry about.

A Z3 is probably a better bet. The BMW will be better finished and the boot is shallow but large compared with deep and narrow. The BMW will probably also go for longer without trouble and cost less too.

But it's Italian... we don't expect perfection, just a heady love affair!

Summary:

Last members to rate this review:
(9 members total)

ANDREWSJK%2FLadyOfLeisure%2FDuncan1%2Fhuddro%2Fsidneygee%2Fkenjohn%2F

View all 9 member ratings

Overall rating: Very useful

Nominate for a Crown:

See all newly Crowned Reviews

Last comments:
ANDREWSJK

- 02/07/01

I like the op , could you make it longer to tell us more about these green cloverleaf cars ???
fitznstarts

- 11/06/01

Very jealous! The only saving grace is that mine is a company car and therefore I don't worry about the repairs, unless it's off the road! It's been fun, but I won't have another.
sidneygee

- 11/06/01

Glad I didna buy a 156. The demonstrators were pretty poor (drove a 1.8 and a 2.5). One guy actually approached me in edinburgh centre and asked how much I liked our Accord R as he was getting into his 2.5 156. It was on its second dashboard and second clutch/gearbox at 9 months old. He was really pissed off.

Best Alfas were the 105 series (1960's and 70's). They aren't particularly reliable, but are easy to fix and not that expensive for parts (as long as the tin worm doesna get in).

I own a 1975 Spider.

Product of the week
Top