Home > Motors > Car >

Reviews for BMW 320d


BMW320D - Expensive Turbo Failure! -  BMW 320d Car
BMW 320d 

Newest Review: ... my petrol car in 5th at pretty much any speed!...if you do this and stall the BMW, which I have a few times its not that easy to res... more

More BMW card     

BMW320D - Expensive Turbo Failure! (BMW 320d)

diggity

Member Name: diggity

Product:

BMW 320d

Date: 30/05/06 (14811 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: Preformance, choice of trim, Economy, Extras, Features

Disadvantages: Reliability - Expensive Turbo Failure, Lack of space / small boot

This is my first BMW, and I am sorry to say my last. The 320d has a reputation for turbo failure, which I believe applies only to pre July 2003 models. This failure can happen at any time regardless of service history and so cannot be predicted or circumvented and is a widely publicised failure amongst 320d owners on the internet!. The cost of repairing this vary between £2000 - £3000 and is not something which I would expect from a name like BMW.

Other drawbacks include driver comfort, which is virtually non existant, and the BMW driving experience can only be described as being dragged over a pebbled beach, after 15 mins in the drivers seat you rapidly experience another feature of the 320D - namely BMW "Numb Bum", which I must admit was not publicised in the brochure.

Both rear seat and boot space are limited and certainly not inline with the size of vehicle, and all BMW's rivals all seem to have more copious amounts of both, so if you have a family (or are planning one) maybe this car is to avoided!.

I bought the BMW 320d thinking that I was going to experience comfort and reliability, and within 1 month of buying a 2002 model, i was left bitterly disappointed on both accounts, especially as I found that the Turbo failure was a known problem and affected a large number of pre 2003 320D's

So if you are planning on buying a 2nd hand model, then avoid anything below a 2003 model, unless you factor in the risk (and expense) of needing a new turbo.

Prior to buying this model, I owned a Vauxhall which in comparison suffered no faults in the same league (or expense) as the BMW in the nine years in which I owned it, and was also more comfortable in comparison.

Summary: If a bmw320D is for you then go for a 2003 or later model

Processing/Quality:     Processing/Quality
Reliability:     Reliability
Driving comfort:     Driving comfort
Last members to rate this review:
(15 members total)

thingywhatsit%2Fkenjohn%2Fflickpugh%2Fsarahlp%2Fxxsaraxxm%2Fcrispy%2F

View all 15 member ratings

Overall rating: Useful

Nominate for a Crown:

See all newly Crowned Reviews

Last comments:
nmdl

- 24/10/08

I have bought a 2002 320d and experienced two major breakdowns. The first was a fuel injection failure at 3 yrs / 30k miles. This was repaired for free as there was a recall on this part, which we had not been informed about. The second at 6 yrs / 60k miles is a turbo failure, which BMW appear to know about as they changed the engine to fix this in 2003. However this time there was no recall so this will cost me £1.5k+ to fix! Very poor customer service. Not going to buy BMW again.
kenjohn

- 01/06/06

I haven't driven this particular 3-Series model, but I have to say I've been more than happy with my own 525TDS. (So far) Mind you, it isn't a patch on my old Jag Sovereign!

Use ful tips (and warnings) here for anyone considering buying this car.

Ken (Category Guide/Motors)

Product of the week
Top