Home > Motors > Car > Rover MGF 1.8i VVC

 Rover MGF 1.8i VVC Car

Rover MGF 1.8i VVC

 

Newest Review: ... and added casually that this must have been a manufacturing defect! A phone call to Rover led to a curt 'Car out of ... more

 ... warrenty' response. We argued that a manufacturing defect surely indicated that the car was not fit for purpose when sold, but they weren't interested. Finally a couple of months of threats and arguments later, the Rover 'Customer Services' department said that they expected the engine to last 100,000 miles and as it had only done 45,000 they would pay 50% of the cost of a new engine, but no labour. The dealer, who had originally sold me the car was totally disinterested. Eventually as the dealer was thr ...more

More Rover card     
mrabanal
Premium Review Rover MGF 1.8i VVC: Great Car, Dodgy Build Quality (497 words)
by mrabanal - written on 17/05/02 (Useful, 4858 readings)
Rating:

A few years ago I fell in love with and bought an 'N' Reg British Racing Green MGF VVC. At the time it was 2 years old. I loved it, it drove live a dream, plenty of acceleration, fantastic handling, amazing cornering - you could throw it any old how into a corner and it just went round. Added to this it had classy classic good looks, easily did 40mpg and you could sunbathe in it. However when the car was just on the 3 years, out of warrenty point, it started to sound like a tractor. I took it back to the dealer and was told by the mechanic 'Oh that'll be the VVC controller failing' before he had even heard it. Apparently this was ...

pphb
Premium Review Great car, bad attitude but great price & weather! (912 words)
by pphb - written on 08/04/02 (Very useful, 5659 readings)
Rating:

Two weeks ago my poor H reg Astra included with it's flaky paint and 150k on the clock failed its MOT, I'd had the little blighter for nearly 4 years. The hand me down from my parents had looked after me well. Over the last couple of years the paint started flaking and looking very, very unsightly! The cost to get it back on the road for another year would be £220! More than the car was worth! That would include 6 months tax & the years MOT. This was just enough, I flatly refused to pay the money & refused to use the car again! I'd rather get the bus! Or walk the 5 miles to work (hmmm! - maybe I exaggerate!) So my boyfriend ...

 

Products similar to Rover MGF 1.8i VVC

Reliable, inexpensive, comfortable, nice shape Automatic gearboxes cost money to fix

Looks Build

lovely to look at - beautiful to drive I haven't found any!!

A drivers car.. Bit juicy on short runs..

cheap to run poor image,rusts

Nippy, Reliable, Cheap to buy dodgy high milersexpensive servicing

More products in Car

Honda Integra TypeR
Power, performance, handling Noise, low/narrow seating

Honda S 2000
Red line madness, driving, style needs to be driven hard to be appreciated

Honda NSX

Porsche 924
retro, rwd fun that for the money will surprise - reliable practical classic for the money none - but rear seat room is impractical and visibility not so good

Mazda 323 (1989-94)
reliable, sporty, comfortable expensive partstacky interior

Toyota Celica (pre 1994)
fast, attractive, reasonable fuel consumption, spacious, inexpensive parts may be expensive to replace, insurance could be high for younger drivers

Vauxhall Astra Mk III (1991-98)
Cheap, fast, reliable, plenty available, comfy, economical, very easy to drive with PAS looks aren't to everyone's tastes, only top models look cool, dodgey clutch, not the best before '95 revision

Ford Sierra/Sapphire
Cheap and plentiful, looks good still, spacios small engines slow

Ford Fiesta (pre-1995)
Reliable and cheap to run Limited protection in a crash, image

Renault 21
Excellent load carrier, comfortable car Image, fuel ecnomy not the best.

Advantages and disadvantages from the dooyooCommunity
 
dooyoo
Guided TourCommunityRegisterLoginHelp
Rover MGF 1.8i VVC