|
Casio QV-700 |
||
There are no reviews for this product yet
There are no reviews for this product yet.
Be the first to write a premium review for this product.
Plus, if this is in one of our categories of the month you'll also go in the First Reviews Draw for the chance to win a bonus 2500 dooyooMiles.
This is your chance - Tell other people about this product from Casio.
Reviews for similar products
Casio QV-3 Plus
by Nibelung - written on 25/07/01 (Very useful, 266 readings)
Rating:
when I get home. I understand why they’ve done, i.e. to keep the camera dimensions down, but I still won’t be using it. I know I could have bought the QV -3000 which has a genuine 3x optical zoom, but, a) it's larger and b), it has the cosmetic appeal of a bucket of frogs. There is no pre -lighting arrangement for the flash, with the result that the auto-focus can sometimes be fooled in dark surroundings (parties/clubs etc). I’m just guessing at the moment, but I don’t think the Microdrive will prove as robust as the “solid-state” Compact Flash ...
Casio QV-2800UX
by jokoo - written on 26/02/04 (Useful, 77 readings)
Rating:
time you have found the set up you are looking for the subject wil l have moved on. A use full feature though and available on other cameras in the QV range. There is a full range of manual controls on this camera if you are new to digital photography and want all the features on a beginners camera it would be a good choice. It also offers fully automatic modes if you need to take pictures without having had any experience. The one drawback with this camera is that it is only 2 megapixel. It has a lot of features, and an excellent lens but the 2 megapixel lets it down slightly. Though the quality is good, 3 megapixel would have been more suitable for this camera. ...
Casio QV-2800UX
Sometimes best then some 3-megapixel! (604 words)by - written on 09/01/02
Rating:
The camera Casio QV -2800UX has appeared a little bit later than 3000-th model. And many had problem: what to select: 3000, 2800 or 2300? With QV-2300 it is clear, 2-megapixel matrix, whose functional and optical possibilities approximately correspond to 3000-th, however size of a frame at it, naturally, it is less. Argument to its favor can be only habit to work with a turning screen. As to cameras QV-3000 and QV-2800, if first is a camera of common assignment, it is possible to name second as the camera of special assignment. It means, that there are problems, which 2800 will make better, despite of a smaller matrix. What integrates. Sensitivity at cameras is ...

