|
Kodak Easyshare DX3600DX3600 makes it easy to take great looking pictures with just the touch of a button. The camera comes with 8MB of internal memory, plus it features a CompactFlash expansion slot so you can easily increase the number of shots your camera can hold. Part of the Kodak EasyShare system, DX3600 is easy to shoot and share. Shoot a picture, touch a button, print and share your pictures with the world - that's the EasyShare System. Simply place a DX3600 in the optional Kodak Camera Dock, touch the button and pictures are automatically sent to your computer and are ready for e-mailing and printing. The Camera Dock will also quickly and automatically recharge your camera's battery pack, so you'll always be ready to take more pictures. Newest Review: ... a slot for a memory card, and I could transfer pictures without having to use the invasive Kodak software. The software that ... more |
||
Price Comparison for Kodak Easyshare DX3600
|
Ex-Pro Mains Adapter Power Supply Source ACReplacement Kodak Part ...
Ex - Pro High power stabilized electronic mains adapter for digit ... Last Update 27.11.2009 05:48
|
£ 12.75 |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
PowerSmart Battery Charger for KODAKKAA2HR,K4500,EasyShareCX4200, ...
Last Update 27.11.2009 05:48
|
£ 14.15 |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
Kodak compatible U-4 Digital Camera USB DataTransfer Cable for Ko ...
All our digital camera USB cables are specifically designed as re ... Last Update 27.11.2009 05:48
|
£ 6.79 |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
by - written on 18/06/02 (Very useful, 305 readings)
Rating:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I am a bit thick when it comes to electronics. I absolutely hate having to read the instructions before I can get to work with anything. I am not a fan of reading (apart from op's on dooyoo of course!) and don't appreciate having to read a novel before I can play with a beloved new toy. When I bought my mobile phone I had to get my husband to read the instructions and then tell me what to do, call me lazy but I just can't be bothered. That's what prompted me to go for the Kodak DX3600. In fact all of the Kodak cameras that I looked at seemed extremely easy to operate but this is the one that stood out ... Read the complete review
by - written on 10/07/06 (Very useful, 109 readings)
Rating:
When I was looking for a Digital Camera a few years ago, I read magazine after magazine. Some were far too complex for my needs, some were too cheap and cheerful to convince me that they could do what I wanted them to do. The Kodak kept coming up time and time again in the comparison tables of computer magazines, both in England when I was spending time there, and in France as well, so much so that I was convinced that I should buy one. I went to town in Plymouth and priced one up and the price was £265 which I thought was a little more expensive than I could manage. I then searched through the net for a better price for the same product and eventually found ... Read the complete review
by - written on 11/12/01 (Very useful, 301 readings)
Rating:
I recently bought this camera for my company and of course I took out on a test drive for a weekend. The camera is so easy to use, the controls are intuitive and logical. It really is a point and click camera but with the added advantage of being able to junk those snaps that just aren't right. One of the features which Kodak don't really shout about is the video mode. Other cameras I have looked at can give give you short bursts of video but this wee beast can shoot video with sound to the limit of the memory. (The camera reports nearly 5 mins with the 64mB memory card I was using!) The resolution is only about 320x240, but hey - if I wanted to shoot ... Read the complete review
by - written on 31/05/06 (Useful, 53 readings)
Rating:
I can't believe that after 5 years, I still own this thing. Perhaps it's a testament to the build quality? I remember shelling out almost $1000 CDN for this. That's about £450 in 2001. You can get these now for a tenth of that. In it's day the 3600 was a decent buy due to the 2x optical zoom and video mode with sound. Other manufacturers were trying to convince us that digital zoom was good too (it's not) and short 30 second movies with no sound would be okay (they're not). The two million plus pixels (2.2 to be exact) was a decent resolution at the time. Bear in mind that camera resolution today isn't the sole selling point ... Read the complete review
by - written on 16/07/02 (Useful, 328 readings)
Rating:
Because of my job I require a Digital Camera that can take close up pictures of small objects. Before buying this Kodak model I had owned another Cheaper Kodak model (£170.00) which did not do what I required or took take decent pictures. I put this down to the fact it was a cheap model. After saving up some cash I had £300.00 to buy a new camera with. Upto now I had using two Fuji film cameras off friends one model which cost £150.00 and one that cost £200.00, both of these cameras did what I needed and produced some stunning pictures. Since I had £300.00 in my pocket and both these cameras where cheaper I was positive that new £300 camera would be ... Read the complete review
| Processing/Quality: | Reliability: | ||
| Ease of use: | Features: | ||
| Picture quality: |
Technical Details for Kodak Easyshare DX3600
Products similar to Kodak Easyshare DX3600
Samsung Digimax L700
Easy to use high quality camera
None I have found to date
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S650
High quality photos, range of features
Weight, not rechargeable battery
Benq DC C1000
10 Megapixel - SD Memory Card
Benq DC E310
3 Megapixel - SD Memory Card
Benq DC C610
6 Megapixel - MultiMediaCard - SD Memory Card
Pentax Optio L20
7 Megapixel - 2 - SD Memory Card - SDHC Memory Card
Kodak Easyshare C713
Easy to use
none I can think of
HP Photosmart M537
6 Megapixel - SD Memory Card
HP Photosmart R837
7 Megapixel - SD Memory Card - SDHC Memory Card
Nikon Coolpix L12
7 Megapixel - MultiMediaCard - SD Memory Card - SDHC Memory Card
Kodak Easyshare DX3600 : Paperweight takes horrible pictures.from Dando83
31/05/2006
from whitelizard
16/07/2002




