Welcome! Log in or Register

Konica Minolta Dimage A200

  • image
£16.99 Best Offer by: digitaltoyshop.com See more offers
1 Review
  • Reliability
  • Sort by:

    * Prices may differ from that shown

  • Write a review >
    How do you rate the product overall? Rate it out of five by clicking on one of the hearts.
    What are the advantages and disadvantages? Use up to 10 bullet points.
    Write your reviews in your own words. 250 to 500 words
    Number of words:
    Write a concise and readable conclusion. The conclusion is also the title of the review.
    Number of words:
    Write your email adress here Write your email adress

    Your dooyooMiles Miles

    1 Review
    Sort by:
    • More +
      18.09.2005 23:45
      Very helpful


      • Reliability
      • Reliability


      Almost a great SLR replacement, but the LCD and EVF can't match an optical viewfinder

      I bought this camera to replace my 35mm SLR with 28-80 and 70-300mm lenses. I was growing increasingly dissatisfied with the way my pictures came back from the processors; the difficulty of sharing them with family by email; and the weight of all that equipment in a camera bag. However I wanted the look and feel of an SLR and the same control over the picture-taking process.

      I opted for the KM A200 because of the manual zoom ring, the zoom range (I would have loved a 10 or 12x zoom but the 28 mm wide-angle was more important), the anti-shake (which all the reviews said worked quite well) and the flip out LCD. This last feature was important because I wear bi-focal glasses and the natural position for reading is looking down, hence the need to adjust the screen angle.

      I couldn’t find another camera with this combination of features, still neat in size and with the track record of Minolta for user-friendly handling. Having ticked all the boxes, did the camera fit the bill? The answer has to be ‘yes and no’. Yes, because it does all the things I wanted it to, but no because I have had to adopt a different way of working when I take pictures in order to achieve the same result.

      The one reason for this, and the big difference between a digicam and a true SLR, is the viewfinder. Neither the LCD screen or the electronic viewfinder give you the degree of clarity that an optical viewfinder does to know whether the picture is properly focussed. This is particularly true of landscapes, where small figures in the distance, eg horses are impossible to see clearly. Bright sunlight also spoils the picture on the screen, so I end up trusting the camera to sort it all out and hope for a good, well-focussed picture.

      The good news is that the A200 almost always gives you that. But when you see it on your computer screen you think ‘I could have composed that better’, but now of course you can. I didn’t really want 8 million pixels, but one of the benefits of this is that you can crop half of the picture and still be left with a resolution that will print excellently up to 10x8 and maybe more. This makes up for the short reach of the zoom as well - if it’s not close enough don’t worry, just crop and enlarge.

      So now I have less control over the picture when I take it, but much more when I view it afterwards, and I can make the changes at my leisure, undoing them if I don’t like them, until I’m happy. And I’m happy with a far greater percentage of my shots than I was with 35mm.

      The rest of the camera is fine. I use spot-focus rather than wide-area because it’s more accurate on the thing you want in focus, and I’ve tweaked the colour and sharpness settings to the max because I think the pictures look better like that, but that’s a personal thing. Again, you can always adjust those afterwards if you prefer.

      Minor niggles are that there’s no landscape mode – it seems a daft omission as it’s there on the Z series and KM’s dSLR, so why not the A200? I use aperture priority set to a small aperture, but it’s not so flexible in low light. The lens hood is so dinky I keep it on all the time but tend to forget that it affects flash coverage and keep getting a shadow in my flash photos, something I'll get used to it in time. The lens cap is small and slippery to grip and it doesn’t have a tether cord – I drop it almost every time I take it off. Every review I’ve read has complained about it so I don’t think I’m just fumble-fingered, but it’s just a niggle, not a big deal. The flip-out screen is also difficult to grip and can take a little longer to flip out than you want when you’re in a hurry to catch a photo, but that could be my problem for having short nails.

      The bottom line is, I’m really pleased with the photos this camera takes. I’m starting to trust it a lot more now and that makes for better picture taking. It’s easy to carry around and handles well. I’ve had to change my approach to taking photos, but now that I have, it’s great.

      By the way, I got a spare battery on ebay for less than £10 including postage from Hong Kong, and also a 1Gb flash memory card for about £30. That’s all it needed, everything else was in the box. It’s not an SLR and you have to accept that, but because it isn’t you don’t get the bulk and the weight. For me the compromise was worth making and I’d recommend it.


      Login or register to add comments

    Products you might be interested in