| Product: |
Bombs over Baghdad |
| Date: |
23/02/01 (9 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: Puts Iraq back in the news
Disadvantages: Too many to lise
You have to wonder what Bush is thinking? Actually... no that's not too hard. Daddy did it so I'll do it too... and it represents my new approach to foreign policy - hard on anything that we don't really like, or don't really understand. What is really disgraceful is the UK's involvement in this debacle. The Americans... you can't really expect more, but the UK should have more sense. Winding up Europe is not the best idea at this time. The point is that the strikes re-focused attention on Iraq, for no real purpose. This will not lead to the removal of sanctions. The world is not satisfied that Iraq has no WMDs. UNSCOM needs to be sent back in, but the message should be simple to Iraq: full access, full clearing, and then the sanctions will be removed. It is clear now that the Iraqi people are incapable of rising up against Saddam, so we no longer need the sanctions, but to simply remove them would be a sign to Saddam that he had won, and he would use that to his full advantage. The other nations in the area wouldn't accept it unless they can be shown beyond reasonable doubt that there are no WMDs in Iraq. It is disgraceful that the US & UK undertook this action without consultation with the UN or even the General Secretary (the mandate for ANY action on Iraq territory) or even NATO. A reprisal that needs further explanation than has been given, and should have been backed with action within diplomatic circles. This is not the way to solve the problem, so a new one must be found - the bombing could have been used as a new momentum in international politics to get this process moving and resolved some 10 years after it started. Clean up the mess.
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 23/09/01 Excellent op! |
|
- 26/02/01 Hear hear, if it were not mixing a metaphor I'd say these cowboy tactics smack of gunboat diplomacy. We can't solve the ills of the Iraqi people, nor get shot of the wicked Saddam by dropping bombs arbitrarily, without having a clear mandate to do so. As a 50+ mother of kids in their twenties, I am cynical enough to wonder whether Blair needed to "break the ice" with the winning US candidate he hadn't backed, and made himself useful by agreeing/suggesting this little spree. It was conveniently close to his visit to Canada and the US where he was to meet George W, and he really had nothing to recommend him up til then. |
|