Home > dooyoo Lounge > Discussion >

Reviews for Bombs over Baghdad


Liberte, Fraternite and Egalite - Updated -  Bombs over Baghdad Discussion
Bombs over Baghdad 

Newest Review: ... of what has occurred are the 'bloodied hands and heads' of masked Tony Blair and George Bush; now yesterdays 'fish and chip' paper; but... more

Liberte, Fraternite and Egalite - Updated (Bombs over Baghdad)

doyoureally

Member Name: doyoureally

Product:

Bombs over Baghdad

Date: 01/03/03 (69 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: History teaches

Disadvantages: lessons repeat until learned

Apparently these 3 words mean nothing to France when French oil contracts are at stake.

France against war - find out why?

I just read some fscinating articles on the current crisis. One thing that I had been struggling with was why the French who have not been shy of an unjust war or blowing up an innocent Greenpeace Boat have suddenly got all tetchy.

Now it could be they are completely and genuinely trying to stop a conflict they believe can be avoided. But consider this:-

When Iraq was a pariah state, France's Elf Aquitane OIL company signed contracts to the tune of $50M that would come into force at the end of UN sanctions. Now if there is a war - it seems likely to me that such contracts would be declared null and void by the new regime (particularly as the reputedly favour the French heavily).

Hard to know what the new contract would be - but seem unlikely the French will be top of any newly elected Iraqi governments shortlist. I am not sure the other nations are any less cynically self-interested but that was one angle on the French I had not heard till today.


Oh and here are a few hostory lessons I remember...

At school, my history teacher always used to say that the reason for studying the past was so that you could help shape a better future.

There seems no doubt that Saddam has WOMD and intends to decieve the world about that.
I assume most people in the world do not want unstable regimes or groups to possess weapons of mass destruction.

The challenge is how to go about achieving that. Let's examine history:-

Dictators with strong military power use it - Hitler, Saddam, and almost every one.

Belgiums neutrality did little to protect it or anyone else in WW1 or WW2.

With WOMD - you cannot rely on a modern equivalent of the French Maginot line.

Politiicans who sanction unrighteous wars never
prosper - but Chamberlain&
#39;s don't do so well either.

What's left ? Maybe we've just got to face unpleasant facts and deal with it before it deals w
ith us.



Summary:

Last members to rate this review:
(5 members total)

west_jenn%2FOphelia%2FMauri%2Fopinions4u%2Fdave27%2F

View all 5 member ratings

Overall rating: Useful

Nominate for a Crown:

See all newly Crowned Reviews

Last comments:
doyoureally

- 16/04/03

Too right Ophelia - that's apparently what constitutes proof of mal-intent in their eyes.
Ophelia

- 09/04/03

The French are always loathe to go to war - it takes the Germans to get to Paris before they stop drinking their wine and pick up guns!
Roxie_228

- 15/03/03

i dont really know how to rate your op! So i havent! Sorry hope it doesnt bother you too much. I have to do an essay on all this 'Should we go to war with Iraq or wait for a 2nd UN resolution' it was given two weeks ago and i have no idea how to write it!!
Information is constantly added and i feel it too difficult a subject to write on :( x x


Product of the week
Top