|
EvolutionNewest Review: ... and can protect them and their offspring over a considerable period of time. Evolutionary psychologists suggest that females therefore have had to be ‘choosey’ over their mate and over any subsequent circumstances that would give an advantage in ensuring the survival of the small number of sprogs that they would be able to have. This means that as most females would reproduce only small ... more |
||
by Zmugzy - written on 04.03.06 (Useful, 249 readings)
Rating:
Why do men have a tendency to be more promiscuous than women? An evolutionary psychological explanation can be put forward. According to the theory, contemporary sexual behaviour is the result of behaviour that has been reproductively successful throughout the evolution of the humanity. This means that natural and sexual selection over hundreds of thousands of years has resulted in a form of behaviour that is still present in humans. Different reproductive strategies in humanity’s ancestral past have evolved and have led to differentiated sexual behaviours and attitudes between contemporary men and women Males are said to have little parental ...
by smisbahuddin - written on 21.02.06 (Not useful, 101 readings)
Rating:
LUCY, CLONES, TEST TUBE BABIES, FLYING SAUCERS, ALIENS EXTRATERRESTIALS, EVOLUTION OF MAN, MELTING POT. Curiosity is strong in me always about knowing new things, One of my professors said gathering information, assimilating information can lead you to knowledge and who knows wisdom. My desire to learn english language started with Mr.Pickwick papers and then followed Reader's Digest, initially I opened the book and found WORD POWER and there in order to test my knowledge of words, I completed their test and the later pages hooked me permanently to this book. As soon as I lay my hands on a Reader's Digest I am so eager ...
by bigbtommy - written on 11.07.04 (Very useful, 334 readings)
Rating:
Let my first start by saying this. I am currently writing a book on bizarre beliefs, and creationism forms a large part of it. In this review, I intend to set out to prove that creationism is not a viable scientific alternative to the theory of evolution or the surrounding theories of abiogenesis, and the natural study of the Earth. The arguments put forward by creationists are fallacious, disingenious and are red herrings on the path to scientific understanding. Creationism or intelligent design should not be taught in school science classes for a number of reasons, which I will delve in to later. There is a great deal of controvesy in both Britain and the ...




