Home > dooyoo Lounge > Discussion >

Reviews for General


What is the best martial art? -  General Discussion
General 

Newest Review: ... months going round Europe & 3 months round Canada and USA so I'll say that! 12. Favourite Season? Winter :) 13. Last Movie you watch... more

What is the best martial art? (General)

donruk

Member Name: donruk

Product:

General

Date: 13/06/02 (2881 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: Self defense

Disadvantages: I hate fighting

There are many different kinds of martial arts. There is Karate Kun Fu, Kimpo, Aikido, Takwondo, Judo, Ju Jitsu, and many other kinds of fighting styles. Most of these fighting styles are over a thousand years old, and steeped in heavy tradition, mostly Far Eastern. What is the best and most effective martial art?
I personally believe that it is boxing. That's right, boxing is the best and most effective martial art in the world.

Why is boxing more effective than traditional Asian fighting styles:

In this world, knowledge, and technology evolves over time into greater things. For example, when armies would go to war in ancient times, the most powerful and effective weapon was the bow and arrow. Now, in modern times, the most powerful weapon in warfare is the atomic bomb. As you can see, the knowledge of warfare, and technology has increased dramatically. The same can said about ancient fighting styles versus the more modern methods of fighting, because knowledge builds on knowledge over time. The truth is that ancient fighting styles like Karate Kun Fu have little effectiveness in modern day life. Sure, these old styles have their place, and are certainly effective somewhat. You might be able to defend yourself, if you caught the guy buy surprise, or he was drunk, but overall traditional martial arts are outdated. Let me give you an example, for those of you that have studied martial arts, do you remember how the instructors would teach you how to punch? You know when they told you to stand in a horse stance with your fists at your side, and then lunge forward; twisting your knuckles as you threw the punch. I'm sorry, but if you go into a fight doing that, somebody will just pop you with a quick left hook and you will be out of the fight. Don't be fooled into thinking that the little old Kun Fu instructor with a 3rd degree black belt will stand any chance, against the likes of Lenox Luis,
Mike Tyson, or any other professional boxer. Tyson will kill the guy, even before he can reach for his sword, or Chinese stars. Boxing is a good example of modern fighting styles. If you want to be tough, and be able to stand your ground you need to work hard, like weight lifting, jogging, learning how to take a punch, learning how to deliver a punch, and most important, battling against an opponent, to gain experience. Boxing is the best example of this. Most of their pro boxers started boxing when they were just little kids, and worked hard for it. Two important things to being a good fighter are stamina, and being able to take a good punch. If you punch a pro boxer, he will just stand there and wink at you. Boxers can take punches better than anybody. If someone has trouble taking punches than he can't be a good boxer, a good fighter must be durable. The way that boxers are taught to punch is the highest and most effective way. Think about this, when a boxer is fighting 12 rounds against his opponent, he is fighting roughly an hour's time. You have to be tough, and in great shape in order to take punch and fight for an hour's time. Most martial artists train in the dojo without even breaking a sweat, and have little or no experience actually fighting, and they would never be able to take a good punch like a boxer can. And as far as kicking is concerned, when a man throws a kick, he sacrifices much needed balance, and is open to a devastating combo from his opponent. Kicking is usually not as powerful as a punch, because of the balance required, and the awkwardness. It is much more natural for the body to throw a punch, than to kick. The legs are to support ones balance, and balance is very important when it comers to fighting. If a guy throws a kick at you, you can easily grab his leg, throw him down, and deliver punches. If you look at the records of many pro boxers, you will find that many have 30 to 40 + fights under their belt. That is allot of e
xperience, which is very important. Think about it, 90% of fighting involves punching, and is the primary weapon, and boxing is just that. Believe me, if 6"5, 240 pound Lenux Luis punched you in the face without his gloves on, it might kill you. Boxers can deliver a horrendous punch. Boxers are taught in the best methods of throwing, and dodging a punch. You don't just block a punch, like you were taught in Kun Fu, or Kimpo, you bob and weave. It requires great skill, talent, and top physical conditioning to be a boxer. In fact many pro boxers are in the best physical condition as humanly possible. You give me any black belt in the world, and I bet that Tyson will tear them apart in less than 20 seconds.


Conclusion:

I don't mean to sound negative towards these other forms of martial arts, but I am just telling the truth. These other fighting styles are more of a Far East tradition. Just like many other cultures, like the French, or the Italians have their own traditions, nations like Japan, China, and Korea, have a strong Martial arts tradition, which are steeped in mysticism, legends, and old Buddest teachings. Boxing is more practical, and more suited for modern day fighting. Forget about what you have seen in the movies, Jaki Chan, Bruce Lee, or Steven Segal have nothing on any professional boxers. Most of these actors have never been in a fight. Personally, I hate fighting. When I speak of fighting in this op. I mean it in a self-defense fashion. Lastly, I want to tell you that size really does matter in a fight. That is why there is weight classes in boxing. The Lakers Basketball star player Shaq could kill a man with his own hands. Sometimes the best way to win a fight, and defend yourself is to run. If you ever were to make Shaq angry, don't stand toe to toe with a guy that big, he will hurt you, and hurt you bad. No black belt will help you in a f
ight with Shaq. He is too big and too strong.

Summary:

Last members to rate this review:
(12 members total)

qrf1%2Ffreespirit1402%2Fmvwmail%2Fmr+blue%2Fdave27%2Fgeordieger%2F

View all 12 member ratings

Overall rating: Very useful

Nominate for a Crown:

See all newly Crowned Reviews

Last comments:
Gaffney

- 14/07/03

Well I dont agree with the statement that boxing is the best martial art in the world! How ever I do agree that there are many martial arts that do not teach relevant and modern street combat! Take karate for example I was a black belt in karate for 3 years and during that time I thought it was brilliant! Then as a grew older and became more aware of moder street fighting I noticed that what I had learned was usless! In karate I was tought to punch keeping one had at my hip! In a fight I would be K.O'd if i did that. Also I was tought to punch slowly and not told how to take hits! In the street as you well knwo you must be fast not slow!

I recently looked for another martial art to take up to improve my self defence and I fould what I regard and what other people regard as the best martial art MUAY THAI! Now dont get me wrong some may dissagree but when you practise it then you will see what I mean. It is based on full power attacks and uses kicking(shins), punching, knees and elbowes and headbutting but that illegal everywhere except Thailand! So that is the matrial art that I feel is the best MUAY THAI!!!!
2bias

- 06/06/03

This must be the most the most inaccurate statement I have ever heard about martial arts, and the means to argument does not make sense. First of all, Mike Tyson can NOT beat up anyone...maybe with boxing gloves in the ring, but certainly not outside. Yes he's strong and fast, but if the little asian guy, who is probably faster, hits three deadly punches to Tysons throat, before he can think, there are no one who can help him.
Also, why exactly is it that something is less effective because it's older? You can't compare boxing and martial arts like that - it's comparing apples and oranges. I think other martial arts are more effective, because they involve legs, which can produce the most powerful impact (hence the atomic bomb), aside from just involving to extra limbs. Try looking into WT (wing tsung) - that's effective! And there are lots of other very effective martial arts too. You should look into that.
billy+namdac

- 06/04/03

As previously suggested by another reviewer, you clearly have little knowledge of the martial arts and also the human body. Firstly it is a scientific fact that the muscles in the leg are far larger then those in the arm. This means that the blow delivered from a kick is going to be more powerful and damaging then the blow from a punch.

Secondly I would like to point out the fact that although a boxer has a powerful punch, pounding someone's face for 12 rounds is obviously far less effective then one well placed strike. punching someone in the throat or corroted artery for example would knock someone out far quicker and for far longer then in the face.

Finally you seem to have neglected the fact that many martial arts do not revolve around just strikes. Breaking someone's arm when they are trying to stab you, for example, is something i'm sure Shaq would fail to do.

Conclusion: the fundamental point is that boxing is a sport and a boxer is an athlete. He/she has no knowledge of weak areas on the body and as someone has already suggested, once on the deck i sincerely doubt a boxer could cope with a martial arts practitioner.

Although your argument raised many interesting points, it also demonstrated your obvious biast and lack of knowledge of the martial arts.

View all 12 comments


Product of the week
Top