|
Lance ArmstrongNewest Review: ... by fluke. Can I just say two things: 1. is impossible to win something like the Tour through fluke. Three weeks in the saddle through sprints and climbs snd crashes and punctures is no way fluke. 2. Critics also say he only won because the big names like Ullrich, Pantani, Jalabert etc. were not in the race. OK, maybe. But he did it again this year, while all the big names were back again. ... more |
||
Read Reviews for Lance Armstrong
by - written on 20/09/00 (Useful, 41 readings)
Rating:
This man is amazing! It's hard enough to win a Tour, never mind two, but to win two after beating cancer! Hats off (or should it be bike caps off?) to the man. Some critics say he won the first one by fluke. Can I just say two things: 1. is impossible to win something like the Tour through fluke. Three weeks in the saddle through sprints and climbs snd crashes and punctures is no way fluke. 2. Critics also say he only won because the big names like Ullrich, Pantani, Jalabert etc. were not in the race. OK, maybe. But he did it again this year, while all the big names were back again. Armstrong is not only seen as special through ... Read the complete review
by - written on 03/07/00
Rating:
All eyes will be on Lance Armstrong this year not only because last year, he won, but because last year he won while on chemotherapy. now he's not on much if any chemotherapy and now it's a test of 'well can i do it now that i'm done with cancer' that might be the thing for him now. he did it when he was at some of his hardest times and now they're mostly over. so if he wins it the second straight year, it would be a big step for not only Lance Armstrong, but for the cycling world. i ride my bike 20-30 miles a day (or at least i try to) and knowing that a man like Lance could win the Tour De France while feeling pretty sh*tty keeps me going ... Read the complete review


