Home > Speakers Corner > Discussion > PR vs 'first past the post'

 PR vs 'first past the post' Discussion

PR vs 'first past the post'

 
Description: Currently the Labour Party are debating at their policy forums whether or not the Proportional Representation system of ... more
PR vs 'first past the post' ... voting should be brought in for the General Election, and local council elections. Dooyoo think that PR should replace the current ‘first past the post’ system?

Newest Review: ... big benefits of this system. Once the votes have been added up the winner is announced therefore it tends to produce quick results and allows the elected government to get on with the business of governing the country. Votes are cast for one individual member so effectively you are voting for the person you want to represent you. Often these people will be identified with a particular party ... more

 ... so indirectly you are also voting for that party to run the country and you know who that party has as its leader. Historically FPTP produces a clear cut electoral winner on a national scale allowing for a party to rule without the need for compromis...more

freediveheaven
Premium Review PR vs 'first past the post': Who voted for that idiot (1251 words)
by freediveheaven - written on 07.03.06 (Very useful, 659 readings)
Rating:

Traditionally it has always been the Liberal party in its various guises that have been in favour of a proportional representative (PR) system of voting which is understandable as under the traditional first past the post system (FPTP) they have had little chance of ever gaining power having to rely on a hung parliament (no one party with an overall majority) to stand any chance of getting power and having a say in the government of the country. It is no real surprise that the other two parties do not entertain thoughts of changing as the current system serves them well as ultimately both parties know that they will be in power at some point in time even if they may have ...

AidanLawes
Premium Review On Principle, PR (744 words)
by AidanLawes - written on 29.05.02 (Very useful, 64 readings)
Rating:

Inherent in the question, is a glaring problem, which is that there are so many forms of PR, which one do you mean? No one is suggesting that Britain ought to have the Additional Member system of voting, as in Germany, for example. Even if you assume that the type of PR used is some variation of the theme of AV top up, as suggested by the Committee set to investigate, one is still not really sure which type would be the preferred option, as the report was very controversial and appears to have been sleved for the time being. One other factor which needs to be considered, is that with a new House Of Lords around the corner (It seems a terribly long corner I know!)we ...

roryMF
Premium Review PR vs 'first past the post': why change? (974 words)
by roryMF - written on 20.05.02 (Very useful, 130 readings)
Rating:

Before you talk about whether PR is better or worst than FPTP you have to talk about all the different kinds of PR. The PR systems used are Alternative vote (AV), List, Single Transferable Vote (STV) and Additional Member System (AMS). Then you break each of them up individually and discuss their positive and negative features. Firstly List PR, this is a good means of democracy as you can vote for a political party or a single candidate, choose more than one party or reorder the party list. This system is used in Israel and Namibia. With List PR you proportionally get the number of seat with the votes you won, so if you won 40% of votes and the party had 200 ...

 
dooyoo
Guided TourCommunityRegisterLoginHelp
PR vs 'first past the post'