Home > dooyoo Lounge > Discussion >

Reviews for Train safety


Government rubbish.. -  Train safety Discussion
Train safety 

Newest Review: ... fully competant staff such as Train Guards are involed in industrial action. Managers and retail staff are 'trained' to act as Train Gua... more

Government rubbish.. (Train safety)

gissing

Member Name: gissing

Product:

Train safety

Date: 12/10/00 (23 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: n/a

Disadvantages: n/a

Why is it that the ATP system is deemed too expensive for roll out on the existing train infrastructure. Although the arguments are fairly obvious, surely a price should not be put on lives. Regardless of protection systems or not, trains are generally safe, and I often wonder if the figures released for ATP roll-out refer to *ALL* trains/lines getting ATP. Surely there is little reason to use this system on all the trains. Would a combination of the two systems available be better? For example, the West Coast Main Line trains would be more usefully equipped with ATP, but a smaller regional train running on rural lines would never need it.


Summary:

Last members to rate this review:
(18 members total)

bigdave%2Fpythons%2Fwocko99%2Fgram99%2FIslander%2FWelshlad%2F

View all 18 member ratings

Overall rating: Useful

Nominate for a Crown:

See all newly Crowned Reviews

Last comments:
gissing

- 12/10/00

i wasnt aware of this policy, certainly never heard that mentioned before...

i quote the dooyoo background to this topic

"Desp ite renewed calls for the nationwide adoption of automatic train protection (ATP) - first recommended in the wake of 1988's Clapham rail disaster - there are no plans to adopt the system. "
libertybell

- 12/10/00

I'm confused. Your title says Government rubbish yet your viewpoint is broadly in line with that of the government - ie ATP for main lines, TPWS for the rest. Please explain ?


Product of the week
Top