|
TV Coverage - Satellite or terrestrial?
Newest Review: ... it have to be enforced on the rest of us ? Take this world cup thing, the same match is being shown on ITV and BBC- I fail to see the log... more |
||
Sky Sports is Number 1 (TV Coverage - Satellite or terrestrial?)
Member Name: Dr_Evil
Advantages: Sky's superb coverage Disadvantages: England matches on PPV
While in my opinion Sky Sports football coverage is undoubtedly the best there is still a major place for terrestrial TV in football broadcasting. In the past 8 years or so since Sky first won the rights to screen the Premier League their coverage has improved beyond all recognition. It is now a superb production with the best presenters, the best commentators and the best presentation. One of the main reasons that Sky wins out though is the time they can devote to a match. Whereas on terrestrial coverage will start 5 mins before kick-off and end 5 mins after full time, Sky can devote an hour or more either side to show all of the build up and post match interviews. Summary: |
Last members to rate this review:
(22 members total) Overall rating: Useful |



