|
VivisectionNewest Review: ... grounds and unnecessary is on cosmetically grounds. In my opinion apposing medical vivisection is an extremely foolhardy position to take. It has saved many millions of lives and will continue to for a very long time, until it is replaced by a superior form of testing or we are made invulnerable to harm. I myself have diabetes and IBS and I would be dead if not for vivisection. Those who ... more |
||
by - written on 09/08/09 (Useful, 145 readings)
Rating:
I would first and foremost like to apologize for my poor previous attempt at this review. There are 2 forms of vivisection in my opinion. Necessary and unnecessary. Necessary vivisection is on medical grounds and unnecessary is on cosmetically grounds. In my opinion apposing medical vivisection is an extremely foolhardy position to take. It has saved many millions of lives and will continue to for a very long time, until it is replaced by a superior form of testing or we are made invulnerable to harm. I myself have diabetes and IBS and I would be dead if not for vivisection. Those who appose this form of vivisection are living in a dream world ... Read the complete review
by - written on 13/01/09 (Somewhat useful, 174 readings)
Rating:
I do not - in any circumstances - agree with this. It is utterly wrong. Making animals grow tumours just so that we can test drugs on them? No! Why do we think it is ok for innocent animals to be horrifically tested upon, when we wouldn't do this to ourselves? Its cowardly! Shampoo and cosmetics dripped in rabbits eyes? How can ANYONE justify this? These poor animals must wake up everyday wishing they would just die rather than have to endure another day of hell. Why do we arrest people for holding people hostage and torturing them, but stand by and encourage other people to do it to animals? The people that agree with this testing, would you put forward your pets, or ... Read the complete review
by - written on 21/11/08 (Useful, 165 readings)
Rating:
I both agree and disagree with animal testing. The part of animal testing I don't like is cosmetics and beauty products as I don't see the point of it, but where medical advancement is concerned I agree with it. I don't mean this is a horrible way, but this is something which affects me in a big way. I have epilepsy which is medically controlled and the tablets which I take have been tested on mice in a laboratory. These types of tests are necessary as people could die/become ill if they took any medication which was not properly tested first. I know that if my medication had not been tested I would have reservations about taking it as I would be very concerned ... Read the complete review
by carol schultze - written on 24/04/08
Rating:
i think it horrific that some companies sell beauty products that have been tested on animlas and then say they arent!! i go out my way to make sure all my ingredients that i use to manufator my produts are not tested on animals or have no animal source in them!! did u know alot of creams have pig fat in them as emulifiers!!#
good news is.. animal testing on cosmetics and beauty will be banned in 2011
carol agnetha schultze
by - written on 04/11/07 (Very useful, 356 readings)
Rating:
I have swung from one end of the spectrum to the other with this review. It is hard to give a balanced review with so many conflicting stories and pictures out there. My overall opinion is that animal testing is a necessary evil until an alternative is found. I don’t want to sound cold hearted and cruel but without these animals the human race would not develop. Illnesses would not be cured and new diseases would not be found. I am for medical testing only, and strongly believe that any other form of testing is wrong and I refuse to by any product tested on animals that have suffered. I hope you enjoy reading this review and that it is as balanced as ... Read the complete review


