Home > dooyoo Lounge > Discussion >

Reviews for Vivisection


I do it. -  Vivisection Discussion
Vivisection 

Newest Review: ... sandwich in your whale rescue break) because the Minky Whales Satnavs are on the blink but where are they when the woodlice and slugs are ... more

I do it. (Vivisection)

magpie

Member Name: magpie

Product:

Vivisection

Date: 18/12/00 (427 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: .

Disadvantages: .

I have had to think very carefully about whether to write this opinion. I hope I can inform you, and I also hope you will not be offended.

Many writers have already discussed vivisection in great depth, but I hope I can give you another angle - that of a vivisectionist.

I work as a researcher into the brain mechanisms of learning and memory. This research involves working with male rats.

In order to do this research, I attended a course about animal ethics, surgical techniques, and the law. I then sat an exam, before I could obtain my personal home office license. This license allows me to carry our certain procedures on rats. Aswell as my personal license, my boss has a project license - this limits the procedures we are allowed to do, and explains their purpose. In addition, we have an institutional license - this ensures the facilities the animals are kept in, and worked on, are to a particular standard. Before any animal work can be done, all of these licenses must be granted.

At any point an inspector from the home office will arrive at the lab, and demand to see paperwork, health records, the animals, surgical procedures, and so on. If anything is wrong, he can demand the animals are put down, or revoke any of our licenses. We also have a vet who checks out the animal health.

These are the procedures which govern our use of animals, and hopefully limit any suffering.

I will not try to morally justify the work I do with animals. The work is important for the advancement of the understanding of the brain.

It is important to understand the brain, and how animals learn, I'll try and tell you why (I'll try not to be too technical!).

For example:

Drug discovery research programs use behavioural techniques to evaluate whether certain drugs interfer with anxiety. One of the behavioural techniques is to examine conditioned fear (that is - present an animal with a 10-se
c tone, followed by mild electric footshock. Subsequently the animal will display fear responses during the tone). If a certain drug interferes with that conditioned fear response, then it may be a useful anxiolytic. However, the work I do examines other possibilities. Is it that the animal doesn't know when to be frightened, can't express fear, can't associate the tone with the shock, fails to percieve the shock, etc. In actual fact, my work involves looking at learning about rewarding events - responding during a tone which has been presented with food reward. The nature of the deficits specific brain lesions cause are subtle, and often hard to characterise. As such, it is important that we can disern the role of these different brain regions in learning.

Another arena my work has an impact on is neural networks. Because different components of behaviour are seperable by lesions, this can help figure out sensible strategies for machine learning.

In addition, the basic learning rules which have been determined in my field using rats, are used to evolve training programs for children with learning difficulties.

These are the reasons why what I do is important, although my own work is not directly related to drug discovery or human problems.

I sometimes hate what I do. Animals do suffer - it would be foolish to say that they don't. Sometimes they get ill. Sometimes they die under anaesthetic. Sometimes they develop tumors. Sometimes they fight with their cage mate. However, I actively work to minimize the suffering they endure. By being considerate, monitoring health, and using well designed experiments, I minimize the number of animals used, and their suffering.

I want to make it clear that I am not a faceless arrogant scientist. I get upset when my animals suffer. I get angry when protocols designed to protect the animals are ignored. I get furious when an experiment is badly designe
d, and animals lives are wasted. All these things happen. And so I can justify what I do, as at least I do it well.

Summary:

Last members to rate this review:
(97 members total)

666disturbed%2Fstikx%2Fsquiffy%2Fbumb1e%2Fsummerland85%2FGoing+To+California%2F

View all 97 member ratings

Overall rating: Very useful

This review has been awarded a Crown.

See all newly Crowned Reviews

Last comments:
ace_of_spades

- 08/07/02

I think if more people like you worked in this area then it would be much less contreversial an issue. It took guts to write this and let people know what you do for a living. Thank you. :-)
wicked_witch

- 03/07/02

Brave, etc, and a good op, but I agree with what the others say, that you are very half-hearted in defending yourself. I believe if you truly believed in what you do you wouldn't feel the need to defend yourself so much. I'm interested to know how you can go through with causing such obvious pain. You also seem to value the life of a rat less than that of a dog or monkey. In fact abusing a rat is as bad as abusing a dog, maybe worse because of its defencelessness. Ach, I'm starting to ramble, and annoy myself, so I'm going to get drunk. LOL, and just so you know I'm not one of those nail-bombing anti-vivisecionists. Just a peace loving vegan hippy :-P
bumb1e

- 26/01/02

i rambled then got a bit angry, i apolagise for my words, back to my point though, how can the results of a rat, which although similar in genetic make-up and brain function-although only in comparison to other forms of mammal-its not a person, so how can the results really tally? if you could explain I would be very grateful. ta bumb1e.

View all 51 comments


Product of the week
Top