| Product: |
Voting fraud in the U.K |
| Date: |
05.05.08 (138 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: Sytems can be sorted
Disadvantages: A Balti Republic?
90% of postal election fraud in the UK since Labor came to power has done by ethnic minorities. You may not want to hear it but that's the fact. Most of that percentage was in Labor constituencies of an Asian/Muslim background. Election corruption has exploded since Labor bought in postal voting and one would presume that's probably why they bought it in in the first place as they knew Asian communities would 'make sure' people of their religion and culture voted for likewise, and so more votes for the Blair and Brown master plan. Postal fraud has been most prevalent in local elections. We have yet to see if they have clamped down on it this time. Vote regulators say the system is still wide open to fraud in the U.K. and in some cases the vote is that of a 'banana republic', or more fittingly, a Balti Republic.
Now we can either grumble a bit or not worry about it...bad practices bought in from abroad etc, or we can get angry about it. Well I personally think it does matter because it's a democracy here and it's being eroded. I don think Muslim councilors do it to just to grab power and all that goes with it I think they do it because they feel they are better off in urban areas that are mostly Muslim. If they can swing marginal`s by cheating those ethnic zones grown and grow. These areas booming in size in our inner-cities and with unemployment rates as high as 40% in some of those, this sort of expansion just encourages that culture of bring the sub-continent ways here. We are not a Balti Republic here. People come to Great Britain because of its democracy and not in spite of it. I fervently believe part of the reason Blair has inflicted un-metered immigration on the U.K is because he knew that most of the block would get British citizenship and so most likely vote labor. Maybe ex pats in Spain do get together to have representation on the councils there but as yet there has been no charges for fraud in Spain for it.
Once you have the local councils sewn up with Muslims for those Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Kurdish communities in the UK etc, multiculturism begins to expand, and with that all of those bad habits. I think we all know those bad habits. Indeed honor punishments have been able to thrive in some areas because of the erosion of traditional democracies and we also know Sharia Law is also been widely practiced here in back street court rooms. The school system begins to go all Muslim and results fall away and so it's easy to turn those areas into their own cultural zones and teach the old ways. Although 7/7 was the worse case scenario from one of these areas there seems to be an increasing number of terror trials in the U.K. I for one cut these guys some slack over the years whilst most were berating them over terror trials, Blair trying to demonize Islam to justify his foreign policy oil grab..But it seems I was wrong again. I don't think its any coincidence that the most fraudulent rotten boroughs are the most expanding immigrant urban areas. Old practices from their home countries are being widely used and it's wrong.
The key to voting fraud in these areas is the newcomer's poor grasp of English. We know women are often not treated equally in some more traditional Asian families and we know Muslims are also expected to follow their holy book, local clerics and councilors more than willing to exploit that fear of their God on local issues through interpretation of the Koran. With one-in-five babies now born in Britain to at least one immigrant parent we can only see this expected voting on race and religious lines continuing here. In London, where this type of electoral fraud is most prevalent, it corresponds with those high birth rates, 56% of all new born babies going to foreign mums in the capital. One-in-seven children in the U.K doesn't have English as their first language. My point here is the nature of voter corruption is absolute control over the voter, the erasing of free will if you like. If you keep your voters under the thumb of religion they will vote your way. We have seen how effective that was in America when the God fearing right voted in the war criminal Bush.
The BNP quite rightfully get next to no coverage before and after elections as we are not happy with their policies and approach. They are a racist party who judge people on their skin color only. I bet none of you knew they won 100 seats across the country. But if you look more carefully at how Muslims councilors approach local elections and the implementation of those sectarian policies they are proven to introduce and encourage, you wouldn't be far off calling their approach racist. You are Muslim so you must vote Muslim. Are they not organizing to vote on race lines? The answer is yes but we can't make that accusation.
The biggest and only reason for multiculturalism is to separate immigrants form indigenous populations, be it internal forces or external ones. Both sides seem to want it that way. Although there has been only 42 successful convictions for election fraud in the UK since 2001 the vast majority were in Muslim /Asian boroughs. Its fair to say 42 is the top of the ice berg. Only three were in white areas, those of the BNP using bullying tactics and flooding marginally white areas with tattoos and thick necks. Clearly the postal fraud occurs where one party feels they can swing a marginal constituency on race lines.
Tactics include diverting people's postal applications and then intercepting them or generating voting cards for people who have moved away, too young to vote or are long since dead but still on the role for an address. Once their names are on the electoral role as the new identity then they will get a voting slip. Other tactics are done by part workers who help people with poor English skills vote for the 'right' person. Birmingham helpers from an unnamed party were just stopping cards being delivered to Tory and Liberal areas through intimidating postmen. In fact postal voting is so riddled with fraud that it wouldn't surprise me if Robert Mugabe sent some monitors over to make sure it was fair.
London...
Although Ken Livingstone was ousted by the cretinous Boris Johnson in the London mayoral election (voters treating the contest as some sort of reality show), Ken won the previous contests by pampering to the ethnic vote, 25% of the city's voting populous. He empowered every race he could with all manner of schemes and handouts and expected votes from those communities in return. Ken is at the centre of fraud allegations over missing funding because of some of those schemes he allowed funding for. Those schemes are in that 25%, gerrymandering at best, outright corruption at worst. But will Boris dare to cut off that funding and so stream of votes next time.
The Evening Telegraph (also known as the Tory Jewish Chronicle by some) has been reporting negative stories about Ken all the way through the campaign and yet mysteriously forgetting to report negative news on Boris the Buffoon. I think this bias should also come under vote rigging rules. I also thought it was outrageous that the nation was shown new CCTV images of the London bombs on the London mayoral election day. That must have influenced the vote in some way. It was interesting that the people least likely to vote for Ken were the ones living in the congestion zones.
My conclusions are that British people cote for democracy and not so much the party. People have thought and died for your right to vote and you should never forget that, even if you spoil your paper at the booth. If we all took democracy for granted we would end up like places like Iraq and South America where you are told to vote for which party by the tip of a gun or the poke of cleric's finger, the same people coming here trying to enforce their anachronistic ways. .
Im afraid dooyoo have banned putting hyperlinks on with your reviews to back up your numbers on their text editor so you will have to tap in postal voting fraud+ethnic communites to see the numbers..
The Guardian and The Times were my main sourcing.
Its all very annoying.
them.
Summary: This is a democracy and so respect it!
|
|
