| Product: |
Budweiser 1795 |
| Date: |
30/06/09 (18 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: Still beer
Disadvantages: Revolting in taste and flavour
A golden yellow colour when poured, it has a rather attractive smell, unfortunately that's where the superlatives end.
Skunky taster, so much in fact you would either have to keep on drinking all night or brush your teeth immediately after, quite sweet, malty and rough. Head disappeared immediately, a lot of fizz at the beginning and retained some throughout the drink. It's quite thin but due to the skunky taste, it's difficult to get it down you (not quite connoseur speech is it lol).
This has to be one of the oddest Czech beers that I've drunk and any positives that can be drawn from it are immediately blanked by the foul taste. The taste compares to the strong rough flavour of much stronger beers and because of the relative low alcohol content (although quite normal for Czech lagers), it doesn't even offer the numbing hammerhead qualities of an extra.
Made in Budejovice, it's easy to see why this one isn't on pump everywhere in Czech Rep. The exporters are clearly living off the good name of Czech beer!
Summary: Skunky!
|
Last comments:
|
- 30/06/09 One to avoid, I think. |
|
- 30/06/09 I haven't tried this one. Surprisingly, it's not made by the Budvar brewery, the people who are in a long-term battle over the use of the Budweiser name with American Bud producers, Anheuser-Busch, but by a neighbouring brewery, Budejovicky Mestansky Pivovar. |
|