Waste of cash (Oakley Frogskin)

Member Name: debo20001

Product:	Oakley Frogskin
Date:	21/03/01 (273 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: look good

Disadvantages: flimsy, expencive

Have you ever owned a pair of these?... If yes than you will know how flimsy and pathetic these shades are.
I got a pair on my way to Tunisia about 1997 time and I payed about £80 - £90 for them. They were fine for the holiday, I remember the amount of compliments I recieved on them. hen I got home I disreguarded them slightly (but still took care of them), but how often do you need a pair of sunglasses in England...
Anyway, I put them on, wore them and the next thing I new both arms had snapped off. I was surprised that they hadnt done it earlier acctually... So I thought i'm not wasting £80, £90 on these, so I went to a good bike shop which do repairs on them. For a set of both arms it cost £12 (can you believe that)... I bet its cheaper to make your own.
But what a crap pair of shades. If your always on the move I would NOT recomend buying a pair of these. I mainly bought them for biking but I dont think I used then once for it.

I think they do some sort of metal issue now, so I would recomend paying the extra for them.

Summary: