Home > Food & Drink > Food >

Reviews for Walkers Baked Ready Salted


Is Baked a Better Taste -  Walkers Baked Ready Salted Food
Walkers Baked Ready Salted 

Newest Review: ... usually buy them in packs of six. They do tend to cost a bit more than the full fat Walkers crisps but this is often the case with diet-... more

More Walkers in Food     

Is Baked a Better Taste (Walkers Baked Ready Salted)

JB01

Member Name: JB01

Product:

Walkers Baked Ready Salted

Date: 13/12/07 (94 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: Healthier

Disadvantages: Tastless

Like most big brand names my Walkers crisps are available in most supermarkets, mine came from Sainsbury's on special offer at 25p a bag. The bag is predominantly red on one side and full of information on the other. Content weight 25g.

NUTRITIONAL CONTENT

In the bottom left hand corner of the package a large 70% number informing us that these chips have 70% less fat than Walkers crisp generally. Below this guide facts concerning content of Calories, Sugar, Fat, Saturates, Salt and how much they full fill
Adult's daily amount, not much for example the chips inside are 98 calories but only 5% RDA. All useful stuff when planning a healthy diet.

On the reverse of the packet some advertising selling the flavour and health advantages of baked food followed by a more specific argument concerning Walkers Baked. Further nutritional information follows including advice on its suitability for vegetarians (these are) and contact details if you have problems with the crisp and the packaging.

THE CRISP

The crisp are various sizes and crinkled, they do not smell as strongly as other crisps I have tried, I think the flavour is rather bland. I munched away loyally at these crisps but did not find them as favourable as Walkers and other non - baked varieties.

CONCLUSION

Obviously the flavour was not a sufficient reason for sending the lot back to Walkers HQ, but after the 1st few crisps I felt like doing just that and asking for a Walkers regular as a replacement. I think although crisps are high in saturated fats etc, one eats so few within 1 sitting you can do without the healthier option. One must ask oneself healthier but at what cost ?

Summary: Are Walker Baked crisps a better crisp

Last members to rate this review:
(24 members total)

freud%2Fmummy2harry%2Fpmcds%2Fkoshkha%2Fluckyarchers%2Fmumsymary%2F

View all 24 member ratings

Overall rating: Very useful

Nominate for a Crown:

See all newly Crowned Reviews

Last comments:
koshkha

- 09/02/08

The problem is that without the fat to carry the flavour and make it linger in your mouth, baked crisps just don't have the punch of the fried ones. But 98 cals is pretty impressive.
mumsymary

- 18/12/07

I raely eat crisps much too fattening

_------*----- -------------x----------- ---------------*--------- ---------------------**-- ---________________*_xxx_ ____*___________________ ___*_____________xxxxxx__ ___________*_____________ __ ________*______xxxxxxxxx_ ___*__________________-__ ___ __*__________xxxxxxxxxxxx x___*____*_______*___*___ ___ ____________xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxx___*___*______*____*__ ___ __*_______xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx____*_____*_______* __ _________xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx___*____*___*____ _*__ *_-__________________llll l______________________*_ _____*__ _________________________ _Merry Christmas
nevikrose

- 14/12/07

i think you have to cut your losses if you're going to eat crisps, you cant go for low fat ones, they dont taste any good, and if you are trying to be healthy you shouldnt eat them much at all. better to treat your self properly, less frequently with normal crisps and enjoy it more.

View all 9 comments

Top