Product Type: Hewlett-Packard graphic cards
Newest Review: ... so its better to spend it on them . Letīs start with the MX200 the slowest and cheapest of the two new additions to the MX series . The ... more
Member Name: Raxxxx
Nvidia GeForce2 MX400
Date: 28/06/05, updated on 28/06/05 (863 review reads)
Disadvantages: not much better then MX200
This is a card that deffinitly is not worth to spend money on atm.
IT had its time in the early years like 2 years ago , then this was considered a good
card , but now you have much better cards with a difference value of 30-40$
so its better to spend it on them .
Letīs start with the MX200 the slowest and cheapest of the two new additions to the MX series . The MX200 has the exact same 175MHz core clock, 166MHz memory clock and fill rates as the original GF2 MX. The difference has to be found in the slower 64bit SDR memory data bus and the even more limited 1.35Gb/s memory bandwith. So they made another one .. the MX400 .. the clockspeed has been increased from 175MHz to 200MHz. the fill rates have been increased fromm 350 Mpixels/sec and 700 Mtexels/sec to 400 Mpixels/sec and 800 Mtexels/sec but .. the bandwith is still the same which .. acually is important for most people .
but hey , if your not a pc gamer and just use your pc for limited stuff like office , windows media player and chatting this is enough to buy if your old one breaks.
I bought it also because my old one broke , was quite allright until i started gaming .
So its a big nono for the gamers today
- Matrox Millenium G200
- Asus GTX 690 28nm PCIe 3.0
- Asus GTX 680 DirectCU II OC
- PNY Tesla K20 Workstation Solution PCIe 2.0
- AMD FirePro W8000 PCIe 3.0
- EVGA GTX 690 28nm PCIe 3.0
- Lindy X-VGA Splitter PRO 1:2
- Aten VS 102
- Startech Composite and S-Video to VGA Video Converter for Computer Monitors
- Startech VGA to TV Video Converter with Remote Control