Home > Health > Health Therapy / Health Treatment >

Reviews for TCP Liquid Antiseptic


Gargling with a HAZMAT -  TCP Liquid Antiseptic Health Therapy / Health Treatment
TCP Liquid Antiseptic 

Newest Review: ... and the main one i use it for is a sore throat it is great for helping kill infection in your throat if you gargle with it and it stops t... more

Gargling with a HAZMAT (TCP Liquid Antiseptic)

moshe1

Member Name: moshe1

Product:

TCP Liquid Antiseptic

Date: 24/11/02 (1336 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: Soothes a sore throat, Is a British tradition

Disadvantages: Carcinogenic

I'd often wondered why nobody in the USA uses TCP. Well, I did some research and I think I've found out the answer.
TCP is 2,4,6-trichlorophenol. It's a flaky yellow solid substance, which in the UK is sold in suspension in small quantities for use as an antiseptic. It's great for cuts and bruises, and as a last resort against particularly evil throat infections. It's also more effective at killing bacteria than toilet bowl cleaner. Practically every UK bathroom cabinet has a bottle of TCP in it.
Anyway... It turns out that 2,4,6-TCP has a close relative -- 2,4,5-TCP. 2,4,5-TCP was one of the main ingredients in Agent Orange. It was discovered during the Vietnam war that the process of making both kinds of TCP tends to produce a particularly unpleasant toxic dioxin, 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
Hence 2,4,5-TCP was banned in the USA in the mid 70s. Dow Chemical still made 2,4,6-TCP for a while, but gave up because (a) demand was low, and (b) the cost of eliminating the dioxin meant it wasn't very profitable. As of now, nobody in the USA makes 2,4,6-TCP.
It also turns out that 2,4,6-TCP is a carcinogen. (Then again, what isn't?)
Oh, and the EPA considers it subject to reporting and record-keeping requirements... So yes, at this very moment English people are gargling with a chemical that the EPA considers a hazardous material.

Summary:

Last members to rate this review:
(10 members total)

thpb3%2Ftiresias%2FFishbulb%2Fkarenuk%2Fgillyman%2Fsleepytigercub%2F

View all 10 member ratings

Overall rating: Useful

Nominate for a Crown:

See all newly Crowned Reviews

Last comments:
tiresias

- 22/12/04

Sorry for reviving an ancient thread, but seeing as your erroneous chemistry may damage the reputation of an excellent product (it doesn't take much for such rumours to spread on the Web), I felt I had to say something.

- The chemical in Agent Orange 2,4,5-T, or 2,4,5-TCP is trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and NOT trichlorophenol. As you can guess, the two chemicals are biochemically almost totally different.

- While 2,4,6-trichlorophenol is a suspected human carcinogen, it is extremely unlikely that the product TCP contains any.

To cut a long story short, "TCP" IS NOT CARCINOGENIC.

On the other hand, it is the only antiseptic on the market which actually kicks some bacterial/fungal ass, and receives a full 5 stars from me!
Fishbulb

- 25/11/02

How very interesting. When I saw your op in the 'newest writers' list I remembered that I wanted to buy some TCP because we haven't got any, however, now I'm not so sure ;o)

Welcome to dooyoo, hope you enjoy the site, there's lots to read and write about here, but don't forget to rate everything that you read :oD

Welcome - Fishbulb >><>?™
gillyman

- 24/11/02

So many carcinogenics that I don't know what to eat, drink, smoke or breathe. Too much science can be bad for the soul!

View all 4 comments

Top