| Product: |
Hotels in California in general |
| Date: |
07/05/02 (89 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: None
Disadvantages: overbooking
Michael J. Barkley 161 N. Sheridan Ave. #1 Manteca, CA 95336 mjbarkl@inreach.com 209/823-4817 May 5, 2002 Radisson Hotels & Resorts P.O Box 1780 Minneapolis, MN 55440-8954 I contracted for a double-double, non-smoking room at your so-called "Award-Winning Radisson" in Visalia, California, May 3 - May 5, 2002. The second warning sign of impending problems was waiting behind a very nice couple at check-in, while your snotty desk clerk explained to them that it didn't matter what they thought they'd contracted for, as far as Radisson was concerned that was a "preference", not a promise, and what they were given was all they were going to get. Then he did the same thing to me. He assigned me a king single, smoking, and said that for the bed I requested (wrong!) that was the only one he had available. I said I didn't care what kind of bed it had, I wanted non-smoking. He said, in effect, "tough", and said "next". I put up with that room for about an hour, before packing everything back up and checking out, but by then I and everything I wore or carried reeked of second-hand cigarette smoke, sickeningly-so. I solved my housing problems by driving back home to Manteca, a 2-1/2 hour trip each way overnight between the convention days. Yes, it damaged my performance at my convention, but since the town was sold out Saturday night with two conventions in town, it was better than trying to endure the room you assigned me. Your clerk's (yes the same clerk) indifferent response to my checkout demonstrates that he's used to doing this to people and could care less. Put in legalize, Room assigned was not the room contracted for. Room assigned was not suitable for the purpose for which it was
intended. Room assigned was not habitable. Room assigned contained harmful quantities of known carcinogens. Absence of disclaimers at the time of contracting for the room leaves you no option to label the contracted-for accomodations a "preference". You deliberately violated our agreement for your personal gain. As with any other intentional tort, your actions warrant punitive damages. But do not offer me money or a refund. I have plenty of money, thank you. The only thing that will satisfy me and persuade me to consider Radisson ever again is if you solve your attitude problems. The way you folks answer your phones, "Welcome to the Award-Winning Radisson" (that was the first warning sign), shows you haven't a clue, you've allowed your ego to interfere with your perception, and as for any award, I award you a Big Fat Zero. You've managed to fool some other rating agency, but not your customers, and not the many people I spoke to at the convention or who read my ezine and website. While we're at it, the service in your *Fresno* Radisson restaurant is spotty, frequently painfully slow. Try watching it during some busy period from a balcony above, and use a stop watch to monitor times between seating, taking of orders, and delivery of them. Funny thing, this Fresno service problem is unchanged from when it was a Holiday Inn. And you can stop sending us all those brochures for your Cruise Line. If this is what we could expect from you, we're sticking with Crystal. Oh, wait, you're going to give me the usual corporate double talk about how Radisson Hotels and Radisson Cruises are completely separate companies. I knew you didn't have a clue. Michael J. Barkley
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 07/05/02 Welcome to dooyoo from one MJBarkley to another. |
|
- 07/05/02 I work in the travel industry and know that any request cannot be guaranteed. With hotels, the only thing that can be guaranteed is the rate (and any additional extras that you specifically pay a premium for). The tone of your letter is quite unprofessional, calling the staff 'snotty' and boasting that you already have enough money is not really going to generate the action you want - it will only create an air of discord. Nowhere in the letter do you state what exactly you expect them to do about it - you don't want money back, you won't accept a letter of apology... |
|
- 07/05/02 The word you mean is legalese not legalize... Mike |
View all
5
comments
|