| Product: |
News of the World |
| Date: |
14/08/00 (26 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: None
Disadvantages: Destroys society
Not paedophiles, but children and society are the ones who suffer from the naming and shaming campaign. No, I'm not thinking of the danger that paedophiles go underground. I'm thinking of the reaction of ordinary citizens. When I see a child who is lost in a shopping centre, say, a few months ago I would have taken it and gone looking for the parents or tried to help in other ways. Now I would rather look away - if I (as an adult) get too close to a child, I might be seen as a paedophile, and fire set to my car or my house at the next occasion, a risk that I'm not willing to take. Furthermore, children grow up in a hate of climate and fear in which they are trained to distrust every adult and see everybody as a potential dangerous paedophile. A normal childhood? Never, because part of a normal childhood is to have relaxed contact to neighbours, teachers, friends - impossible where everybody is seen as the deadly enemy. Why paedophiles? An objective look shows that far more children are harmed by speeding cars or drink driving. So should the News of the World name and shame everybody who got a ticket for speeding? No, speeding is acceptable behaviour for the majority of readers, so the News of the World could not risk alienating their readers. Paedophiles are so easy targets. On a more fundamental level, a civilised society should never accept mob rule and lynching, even if the victims are "only" paedophiles. It is unacceptable that there are so few politicians, journalists, celebrities and ordinary people who stand up and state clearly and unambiguously that mob violence can never be tolerated, and that there can be no excuse for igniting hate. If this is not clear, then society has not learned anything from Germany 1933.
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 25/08/00 I absolutely agree with you .
The real people that are dangerous are the ones that always get away with it .maidmarion . |
|
- 15/08/00 Agree completely, it is an indictment of society that sees mob rule. It made me despise the News of the World even more than I did before, and didn't help anyone. Not least the victims of pedophilia, who I don't think would particularly be helped by knowing where these people lived and seeing them in the paper. It was a sick attempt to tack onto the waves of repulsion after Sarah Payne's death, which, in my opinion, makes it all the more despicable. Papers are out to make money, and sell more papers. |
|
- 15/08/00 You've tackled a very tricky subject in a very clear, concise and, in my opinion, humble though it may be, very brave way. The name and shame campaign was an extremely ill advised one, a couple of innocent people with the same names as this scum, were hounded into moving to get away from people deciding to take the law into their own hands. Trouble is, papers such as this are so powerful, that it is easy to get sucked into these things, this is one of the reasons why I don't buy them. |
|