Nuts or Zoo? (Nuts)

Member Name: mathomas13

Product:	Nuts
Date:	30/10/08 (223 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: Its weekly

Disadvantages: Not as good as Fhm

There was a gap in the market for a mens weekly, and the biggest magazine company in the UK decided to fill it, creating Nuts. However, one employee saw the plans for the magazine and went to their rival magazine company, who later came out with Zoo.

So both magazines were aimed at the same market, both the same price. So which is better, well that depends on what you want in a magazine. I would have to say that i prefer Nuts to Zoo, as i always think there is more writing in Nuts, while Zoo is a bit too pictures orientated. However, i usually only buy a magazine when i am traveling, so i tend to buy them both as they are that cheap.

When i am traveling on the train however, i skim over the pages with nudity (out of respect for the kids!), so i find that i hardly have anything to read in Zoo!

But if you just have half an hour to spare, one of these magazines is good for a quick read. Its not like eithr discuss hard hitting issues, its all either about women, football, or gadgets usually. Both have an "accidents" page, i think they both do lipreading football games too, and ladies confessins etc.

But Nuts is obviously winning the battle as thy sell much more than Zoo. So all in all, Nuts is a good, light hearted magazine, and being weekley it means you dont have to wait for a new magazine to come out all the time. But not as good a read as FHM

Summary: worth the £1.30