| Product: |
The Mail |
| Date: |
15/09/00 (17 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: Wiping Windows(with a touch Non brewed Sarsons)
Disadvantages: It exists
Well spoken (or in this case, written) Miqsue. Does anybody wade through all that balderdash called the Daily Mail? Have you ever seen such a sad case as Linda Lee Potter,and twenty pages of Femail, are you sure? If anybody reads the Finance pages then you don`t deserve to have money in the first place!! The sports writers are execrable, droning on and on as if they really believe anyone will take the bother to read the tosh they scribble. An absolute shower . The pity of it, they (the journo`s and editors) actually take themselves seriously, not for one second do they realise they`re on the same (or lower) scale of journalistic prowess and less interest than the Dandy or Beano, at least the two comics were written by honest people. There was a time, many years ago, when the Mail had pretensions enough to be a broadsheet,that it could, with certain reservations,aspire to be a cut above say The Daily Mirror and it`s ilk but now it`s fallen so far down the slippery slope that it is in this persons opinion the worst publication of its type, just worthy of putting vinegar on and wiping a fish shops frontage. I applaud you Miqsue.(See :Why I hate the Daily Mail)
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 16/09/00 I apologise for my comment below. On looking at the time I posted, I was out of order. I am confused as I don't understand your reference to Misque. You obviously don't like the Daily Mail..... |
|
- 16/09/00 I feel perhaps you have a talent for possibly writng better reviews than this. I gave you a useful rating. I think I was being genorous. It was a bit of a rant. |
|