Too slow (WWF Magazine)

Member Name:

Product:	WWF Magazine
Date:	20/12/00 (10 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: Superb action shots, all round picture quality.

Disadvantages: Too behind the times.

The offical WWF magazine is a very good magazine, but of course it has its flaws.
For a start, it is written in kayfabe so for the educated fan, it can be very frustrating.
The pay per view coverage are also most commendable, with superb photos of the matches in full flow. But the trouble is, they review the events three months later because of printing restrictions from across the atlantic.
This can also be both frustrating and annoying to owners of SKY and ONdigital, as the magazine may conduct an interview with a wrestler, and the wrestler may say how much likes his fans, and then when you actually read it that particular superstar has turned against his fans and is heel.
I would have to say that the cons outnumber the pros. But, it is the cheapest wrestling magazine around and the picture quality is perhaps second to none.
Buy it if you don't have Sky, but if you do, steer clear.

Summary: