Ericsson T39m

Having owned numerous phones, from the modest Phillips Savvy, a Nokia 3210, 8210, 7110, and a NASTY NASTY Vodaphone Sagem, this T39 came as a nice suprse to me. I only came across this phone because it was offered to me at ludicrously low price (brand new, and not 'hot' before people assume) and my dad had his eyes on my nice and sleek 8210. So I took the plunge. And i'm flipping happy i did! Aesthetically, the phone is very nice to look at. It has a crisp sharp appearance and it 'feels' expensive to the touch. The battery is extremely thin, but thats not to say that its life suffers. I havent charged mine for about 4 days ...

The Ericsson T39 is the predecessor of the popular T28. Anyone that owned the T28 knew that it lacked in essence and the T39 is basically a better and more sophisticated version of this model. The Ericsson T39 undoubtedly differs from the T28 in a range of manners. Concerning size wise the T28 wins the competition but only if you were to compare the two phones together. Yes when you place the T28 next to the T39 you can see the difference in size but in you were to actually measure it then it would be obvious that it is only larger by a few millimetres. Viewing the T39 you can see that without the pre impression of the T28 the T39 is definitely a thin and ...

Sorry for the title, for those who do not know, ericsson have been guilty of building phones that are a little flimsy, the T28 has the tactile response of a childs play phone.... However, this is about the T39m, and what a leap forward it is...I have had the phone for around two weeks now and I am just about getting to grips with it, so here are my opinions... Immediately it is clear that the construction of the phone is in a different class to the T28, it is solid, has a great "feel" and balances perfectly in the hand, the flip feels solid and well made and the buttons are a perfect size and have good feedback. The features are a ...