| Product: |
Young Offenders - What Should The Law Do With Them? |
| Date: |
15/11/00 (129 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: Teach correct ideals and morals
Disadvantages: If its not done, watch out
Far to many children do not have the dicipline they need these days. As an educator I suffer from the problems this creates. I can also related to the flip side of the coin as a parent. My children recieve fair punishment and praise for their behaviour. If they harm someone or try to do something that will hurt them I will use physical punishment. But I will also praise and reward good acts and work. I seem to find that those children who misbehave and cause disruption in the classroom recieve little or no direction and dicipline in the home. As a teacher my hands are very tied as to what I can do to give direction. I have had cause to have severe words with children, only to have parents rant and rave at me for the "punishment" meeted out. What ideas does this implant in the childs head. This behaviour ultimately leads to children becoming offenders. They are without good direction and so carve a path in society based on low morals. They do not know the "normal" boundaries and before they can make improvements in their attitudes and acts they need these lessons. So young offenders first need to be taught that there will be punishments for the crime. They also neeed reeducating to give the the right moral values. Many young offenders I have dealt with that follow this path tend to realise that they are doing wrong, but the funding and resoucing is not availble on the whole. Dicipline starts at home and we also need to give parents the right education to start this. But we also need to tackle the problem child, while they are that, YOUNG.
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 25/06/01 Good op The worst thing that ever happened to education in this country was the abolition of corporal punishment. It certainly kept me in check and I didnt grow up the worse for it. |
|
- 01/04/01 Excellent. Short, sharp and worth a crown.
Singapore is not perfect; I oppose capital punishment (except for media chiefs and failed home secretaries) and I oppose most sorts of political censorship. BUT Singapore does seem to have SOME of the answers: (1) an absence of CORRUPTING media (No Channel Filth diet of films about serial killers...) (2) ZERO tolerance of crime (no kid would dare spray grafitti or even drop litter) (3) an ethos that involves pride in the self, the family, the nation, high standards... Not so very long ago, Singapore was a place of racial riots, crime and great poverty. Singapore possibly has HAD to be strict in order to escape from the corruption and misery that have continued to plague some neighbouring countries. I would not want the UK to become a joyless police state (which some people unfairly have suggested Singapore has been close to becoming) but I do think we have to (A) persuade certain parents to abandon gutter morality or nihilism and adopt some more decent and positive set of moral standards (no bullying)(B) PUNISH kids when they bully others and disrupt schools and housing estates (AND PUNISH the BIG guys: the sleazy media chiefs, the sleazy politicians, the sleazy arms salesmen, the sleazy drugs barons, the sleazy businessmen...) I can't see LABOUR (Maxwell, Eccleston, Robinson, Hindujas...) or the TORIES (Aitken, Archer, Hamilton...)getting it right.
Did they punish the killers of Damilola Taylor? If a crime like that happened in Singapore.....but then it probably wouldn't happen in Singapore. Why has Jack Straw not been sacked? |
|
- 05/12/00 I actually took a histroy session today that looked at corporal punishment in shools. I was surprised to find that a majority of the children felt it would be a good thing to bring bak. All most of them want is a good guide to the limits. |
View all
6
comments
|