A good idea, poorly executed (Fallout 3 (PC))

Member Name: Mutalisk

Product:	Fallout 3 (PC)
Date:	25/02/09 (25 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: Great concept, stunning graphics, amazing atmosphere, good score.

Disadvantages: Unrealistic combat, VAT system poorly executed, little variation in graphical themes.

Fallout 1 and 2, both of which were turn-based tactical RPGs, of similar style to the Jagged Alliance and X-com games of around the same era were more than ideal for a format overhaul. However, the way in which this game was put together was less than perfect. A first OR third person shoot-em-up, this game is basically a remake of Fallout 2, as far as the story goes, with vault-dwellers, radiation mutants etc. Not terrible in itself, as the plot is not much short of excellent, with much non-linear gameplay and some truly fantastic atmosphere, not to be sniffed at, these guys know how to make good atmosphere, just look at Bioshock! My main problem with this game was the VAT system, present in a different capacity in the game's predecessors. It allowed the player to target a particular part of the enemy. (obviously pausing the game in the mean time,) whilst zooming out and showing your (easily customizable) character fire at the enemy. This is a great idea but poorly executed. The physics engine didn't really account for it, as the effect of firing off a few rounds into a mutant's brain doesnt really cause him to move his head all that much. On that note, the balance isnt great in terms of firepower. It takes too many shots to kill an enemy (The game isnt too hard, just a little irritating) and this makes the whole feel of the game a bit silly. All in all, it just could have been done much better. In summary, the game is way overrated.

Summary: Could have been done way better, but still good.