| Product: |
American Psycho - Bret Easton Ellis |
| Date: |
26/09/00 (322 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: none
Disadvantages: waste of valuable time, money and effort
American Psycho is billed as a black comedy, but quite frankly there is nothing amusing about Patrick Bateman or his twisted and very sick pass times. This book, amongst other things, is boring. Patrick Bateman is obsessed with what people are wearing, what they are eating and where they are eating it. This means that American Psycho is pages and pages of description about clothes and food (with a whole chapter thrown in on Phil Colins - oh joy). Dull, very dull. Then, he decides to murder another woman, child or homeless person in just about the vilest way possible. The book follows a progression something like this: clothes, restaurant, food, booze, murder, sex, murder. This all makes for very boring reading. I read a lot of books and this is one of the few that makes me kick myself for bothering to finish it. I kept turning the pages hoping that something would be explained, that a genuine effort would be made to identify, or even justify, the causes of Bateman's insanity. I was mistaken. Easton Ellis seems to have decided to write a book about a madman, without deciding the causes of his insanity. The whole book sits on the fence, even Bateman doesn't try to justify or explain his feelings. Now maybe that is the point and I have missed it. I found this book very tedious. American Psycho is not worth the paper it is written on, either in monetary terms or in terms of a contribution it makes to literature. Overall, I found this a book that left me irritated. The book makes statements without anything to back them up and obviously just assumes the reader will unquestioningly accept this. It asks the reader to accept Bateman's growing psychosis without question; to accept that he never gets caught - as an intelligent girl I found this impossible to do. This book has been discussed and debated in my office where three quarters of the staff have read it and the debate focuses on why any of us bothered to read
it. I intend to read another book by Easton Ellis as I do not feel his literary abilities should be judged by the weaknesses and flaws of American Psycho.
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 25/05/03 While I do agree that parts of the book can be winding and tedious, the book, in my opinion isn't meant to profile the American Psycho, so much as it is to profile the Yuppie. What you have to realize about Bateman's character is that not only is he an egotist and Obsessive Compulsive, (thus the long descriptions), he is also a sociopath. One could argue that the events in the book were all in his head. Yes, Paul Allen did go to London, but Bateman made up some delusion about killing him. This possible solution would void all relevancy for an explanation as to who cleaned up the murders. Also, Bateman never gets caught because of the indifference in the world of this book. You can't judge a book by our reality, but the reality the author creates. Everyone is very indifferent, or if not void of concern, they are overdramatic. Which makes the book very comical. Not that he kills, but the reactions of people whom should discover his nasty secret, by all means are put in that position, but yet, because of their own absurdity fail to see the psychopath in him. In the movie it's displayed very well when Jean (his secretary) sees all the doodlings in his journal and she is really the only one who understands. I say to each his own, but before you pass judgement on a book, be sure to rationalize from all angles. |
|
- 11/03/01 I found what you wrote very tedious. I didn't get to the end, sorry.
But hey, that's just my opinion! |
|