| Product: |
The Diary of Jack the Ripper - Shirley Harrison |
| Date: |
18/08/00 (37 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: A good story
Disadvantages: will miss inform first timers to this subject
The Diary of Jack the Ripper is one of the least informative books of the many written on this subject. In my opinion it is not even well researched, if the author has carried out extensive researched then all the evidence which does not fit into their theory (and there is a lot of this) has been conveniently lost or forgoten about. I notice one argument for the validity of this story is that, there would have been uproar in the academic community if indeed this was a hoax. A great many ripperologist's have questioned the validity of this book, one a very good friend of mine. I was in the room when he recieved a phone call from the (then) owner of the film rights to "The Diary". He was thretened with the might of his publisher's legal machine if he did not change his opinion. I would like to add that his publisher knew nothing of this and sent an appology as soon as they found out. I would recommend that anyone reading this book and wanting to be better informed on the whole argument of the identity, existence of Jack the Ripper, visit one of the web sites that ripperologists use to discuss this forever raging debate
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 12/12/00 There is also a book called "The complete casebook of Jack the Ripper" by Donald Rumbelow. It's pretty good and very informative. It talks about the facts, suspects, victims, and the circumstances in which the victims lived. But there are some graphic photos, such as morgue pictures of the victims. You wrote a great review. |
|
- 21/08/00 Have you read my comments? Someone after my own heart that appreciates, obviously, the value of the true historian and can appreciate the difference between fact and fiction |
|