First Hand Look at a Fourth Rate Novel (The Fourth Hand - John Irving)

Member Name: TheChocolateLady

Product:	The Fourth Hand - John Irving
Date:	16/04/05 (375 review reads)
Rating:

Advantages: You can almost feel that hand

Disadvantages: weak characters

I hate to say this but, I think I'm going to have to stop reading books by John Irving. How sad does that sound? Pretty sad, huh? Well, I'm afraid that's how I feel, and while I didn't hate The Fourth Hand, my overall feeling after reading this book was one of "so, what?". Let me try to explain.

This story revolves around the character Patrick Wallingford - an unusually attractive man but only a second-rate television news reporter who never seemed to have gotten the really good stories. Then, he becomes a headline himself when a lion bites his hand off during the filming of a piece on a circus in India. After that incident, his career takes an unexpected turn, as does his overly-steamy sex-life. But when a hand surgeon offers to give him a hand transplant, his life gets turned upside-down because the donor hand has "strings attached" in more ways than one!

Sounds baffling, doesn't it? Of course it does. It's a book by John Irving, isn't it? And that means its going to *have to* be weird. If anyone saw the film "Return to Me" about a man who loses his wife, donates her heart to save someone else's life, and then later meets and falls in love with the woman who now has his departed wife's heart, will know how eerie the idea of a donor's relative being in contact with the recipient can be. Thing is, that movie made it seem less creepy than it sounds, but Irving isn't one to ever go that route, not by a long shot. No, Irving will always find the most absurd and unconventional path that one can possibly imagine. In this case, the donor's wife wanting visiting rights of the hand - and what's more, her thinking that getting pregnant by the recipient of her husband's hand will help her finally have a baby by her own departed husband. See what I'm talking about - it's a typical Irving quirky plot. Of course, there's more to the story than that, but I think you get the general picture here.

As you can also see, Irving has - once again - given us a cast of characters that are ... well ... frankly, stranger than fiction - if one can say that about a book of fiction. I found that Patrick Wallingford was actually the least bizarre of all the characters in this book - and he is supposed to be the main character. In fact, Irving has written him to be the one that you'll remember the most. My problem with this character is that while Irving has told you that Patrick is so attractive that women throw themselves at him, I couldn't picture him as being all that good looking. This is probably because Irving has painted him as a type of person who doesn't actually take charge of his life, but rather seems to be swept away by its events. For me, that's a sign of weakness, and so while I read this book, I kept getting a feeling that while the guy wasn't ugly, he really couldn't actually be someone who would turn a woman's head. I kept seeing him with a blank expression on his face that would signal - well, stupidity - for want of a better word. And I'm afraid I have never found stupid men to be in the least bit attractive. In this, I not only felt that Irving failed to help the reader experience the character of Patrick as he was built in Irving's head, but that Irving almost lied to us regarding this character's true physical attributes. One could almost say that Irving cheated me out of getting to 'see' the real Patrick Wallingford.

A more anomalus character would be Doris Clausen - the wife of Otto, whose hand is donated by Doris to Patrick for the transplant. What makes her so curious is the way she is attached (morbidly so, if not almost physically) to her dead husband's hand. That attachment is probably part of the reason why Patrick finds her appealing, or could it be that she seems to be the only woman he's ever met who isn't at all sexually interested in him - but rather in the part of him that doesn't originally belong to him! Once again Irving didn't give me enough to go on about Doris to actually allow me to envision her as a real person might appear. I'm not saying Irving doesn't describe her looks. On the contrary, he is quite clear about that. But unfortunately, like with Patrick, Doris' character doesn't seem to click with the descriptions that Irving has given, and I found myself with a very blurred image of her in my mind, throughout the book.

Next on our list is Dr. Zajac - the hand surgeon who is not only trying to help Patrick replace his hand, but also to promote himself professionally. Other reviewers of this book have found this character to be one of Irving's most comic ever. I'd have to disagree here. While he was likeable, in an off-beat and humourous way - and probably more distinctly pictural than either Patrick or Doris - I found that he seems to have been written as more of a sad person than a funny one. This could have been a good thing, but unfortunately, he wasn't the type of character that readers get a great deal of empathy for, partially because of his secondary role in the novel. This means that while he seemed sad, I didn't really feel sorry enough for him, to actually sympathize with him. The other character that takes a large-ish role here is Mary, a co-worker of Patrick's at the television station. I have to say that she was probably the character I could identify with the most - a hard-working career woman who also wants a family, even if it can't be a conventional one. Mind you, while I liked her in some ways, I also found her character to be slightly one-noted, and sometimes inane and occasionally desperate to the point of being annoying.

Of course, there are other characters here, but they're minor, and therefore even less developed than the four mentioned above. But I should mention that there was one role in this book that really had me sucked in, and that was the part of ... wait for it ... the donated hand! Sounds absurd, I know, but in truth I think I felt I could actually feel and see this hand much more vividly than any of the other 'characters' in this whole novel. In fact, my overall feeling about this hand was that Irving put more into its interaction with the rest of the story than anything else. Thing is, just how much does one want to get ... attached ... to an amputated appendage? That is, unless it's your hand that's being replaced, of course. And the really astonishing thing is, that this is where I actually started to feel some emotional connection to this story. I'm telling you, I actually was rooting for this hand to make it, to totally come to life on the end of Patrick's arm. And I read this book was long before I severed the tendons of my own finger, and lost most of its movement and much of the feelings in it. So at least, on this level, this novel did succeed to a certain extent, for me. In fact, that's why I gave this as much as three stars, when up until now, I'm sure you were all wondering why I gave it more than even one star. I mean, credit where credit is due, right? And the book is called The Fourth Hand, so perhaps there is something in the title role of this book having a truly major part to play. And I do have to say that thankfully, Irving doesn't step totally overboard by speaking to us as the hand itself.

All that said, if you've ever read any other of my book reviews, you'll have noticed that I usually find character-driven stories to be much more intriguing, and usually better written, than plot-driven stories. In this case the plot here is, in reality, not one that is all that unusual, if you boil it down to its absolute basics - that being: the trials of a broken man trying to make himself whole again (both metaphorically and literally, in this instance). While this could be made into an interesting book that might overcome flaws in the character development, unfortunately, the off-the-wall way that Irving presents this story-line puts it into the realm of almost the fantasy genre. While that might be fine for Lord of the Rings, we're talking about a literary fiction book and not a fantasy novel, and so, as usual, the plot here just isn't strong enough to pull the reader in.

But if a plot-driven story is less captivating than a character driven novel, and given what I've said about how I felt about how the characters are drawn in this book, then I must say that the overall feeling I got out of this novel was one of (and do excuse the pun, both intentional and unintentional) detachment. I felt no true emotional connection (sorry, yet again) to the 'real' characters in this book. What makes me so disappointed with this novel? If you compare my descriptions of Irving's books The Cider House Rules or A Prayer for Owen Meany, then you'll certainly understand why I'm afraid I'm going to have to give up reading John Irving's novels. In short, he has lost his ability to make me, as a reader, care for his characters. And if you can't care for the characters, then how can you care what happens to them?

But you know something? Perhaps I might have enjoyed this novel if I hadn't been expecting something that would better or at least equal Cider House or Owen Meany. I felt much the same way about A Son of the Circus, and although A Widow for One Year did have sympathetic characters, no character Irving has written since Owen Meany has ever gotten to me like that one did. Sorry, but that's how I feel. Not truly recommended, and only three stars.

Thanks for reading!


~~~~~
Technical Stuff:
Available on Amazon.co.uk for £5.59 in paperback 384 pages (June 3, 2002) Publisher: Black Swan, ISBN: 0552771090, £11.89 in hardcover 326 pages (July 9, 2001) Publisher: Bloomsbury, ISBN: 0747554323, or used from 1 penny! Tell you what, I'll send you my copy for free and I'll even pay you the postage.
~~~~~

Summary: Irving jumped the shark... or is that lion with this one