| Product: |
Microsoft Certified Professional (MCP) in general |
| Date: |
20/07/01 (893 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: I am sure there might be one, I just can't think of it
Disadvantages: waste of time, waste of money, waste of effort
Disclaimer: Be prepared for a completely biased opinion! I hate PCs and I particularly hate Microsoft and I have been sent on Course 2152B (Implementing Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional and Server). The prerequisites of which include successful completion of course 2151 (Microsoft Windows 2000 Network and Operating System Essentials), or equivalent knowledge, which I don?t have. Oh joy! I decided on Monday morning that as much as I was annoyed about my boss sending me on this course and I was going to be away from my luscious Apple Mac G4 for a full four days, that I would try to have a positive attitude towards it. My boss as it happens had been (somewhat mis-) informed that if two employees qualify as MCPs (Microsoft Certified Professionals) that your company becomes a Microsoft certified Solution Provider. Not true but nonetheless there we were, in a class of eight people, eagerly awaiting the onslaught of the 2,500+ page training notes folder we had been given! The course itself was to be presented through lectures interspersed with demonstrations and practical exercises. The first thing I noticed was that our classroom mousemats had been designed by one of the guys I work with. That quite amused me but also reminded me of the lovely studio where I work and how much fun they would all be having. All I needed then to really bring me down was the announcement by the trainer that the course was actually a 5 day course but we were going to cram it all into 4 days. Great! Not only was it going to be difficult but it was going to be skimmed too! The first exercise was, as usual on the courses, was introductions. We had to tell everyone our name, company, job title and any previous experience with the product- in this case the Microsoft 2000 family of products (Server, professional etc.). And there was the first dilemma! Do I tell these people that I actually maintain a Mac network with PCs, running through a Mac server? Maybe not. And alt
hough honesty is always the nest policy it surely wouldn't go against me if I just omitted a little bit of the truth now would it? I admitted I had no Windows 2000 experience, which opened a floodgate of other class members admitting the same! Luckily the trainer (why do I have a compelling urge to call him the teacher?) took this news quite well. He was very helpful and said even though we would struggle without the prerequisite qualification or experience, that he was happy for us to stop him at any time to clarify any concepts or terms we were unsure of. I was later to discover that this would have meant I stopped him roughly every 45 seconds but at least the offer was there! The next part confirmed my existing beliefs in the poor quality of Microsoft products, although I hadn't realised until then that their shoddy workmanship also applied to the course materials they produce in addition to their software. The first module of the course was to clean install (as opposed to upgrading from an existing product) Windows 2000 Advanced Server on our PCs. The course material contains 120-day evaluation copies of both professional and advanced server. What Microsoft hadn't accounted for was the possibility of boot software (Boot Magic in this instance) preventing installation. This theme continued through the entire duration of the course. Errors appeared on several members of the course's machines repeatedly (though never everyone, the same people or the same time!) yet Microsoft have provided no fallback for their software not doing as it should and there are no trouble shooting tips. In the long run this meant a lot of wasted time whilst the trainer fixed individual problems. In particular, the course involved obtaining and storing a set of scripts from the domain server which are suppose to configure the machine and install the necessary course materials. These caused permission problems on every exercise, and really illustr
ated the poor quality of Microsoft's product and support. The course material itself was also of low quality with the slides being a Power Point presentation that my Gran (who has never used a PC before, and is partially blind) could probably make after 5 minutes training and access to the clip art folder. It was highly unprofessional with over-use of sound, clip art and colours. the course folder printed material contained spelling mistakes and discrepancies between the presentation, and the CD laboratory files. Also the trainer notes were littered with incomplete and sometimes technically incorrect answers. The teaching method itself is also questionable as the exercises take the form of doing something the wrong way until you reach a critical error, the starting again and doing it the right way. On a personal level this only served to confuse me and on reflection I cant recall which way of applying the things we 'learnt' is the correct one. The timescale in which we were covering the modules was not enough to learn both a right and wrong way of going about things. I really think they have taken 'learn by your mistakes' too far in this case! Also the method of learning was basically following a list of click-by-click instructions, which in reality requires little if any brainpower. This led t o a general lethargic attitude throughout the class and made the actual content of the lectures seem very boring. At times they became more of a stopgap between your next set of instructions than anything else! At one point in the course we spent nearly an hour doing a lab exercise on using the 'configure a printer' wizard! sad, but true and completely pointless! There were also occasions when we were hurried without completing exercises and reviews due to the tight schedule the course needed to adhere to. Overall I don't think this course does Microsoft any favours and it certainly doesn't give you any
confidence in their products, support or ability as a training provider. As I mentioned, I am biased, but I really can't see this particular course being of use to anyone apart from an experienced administrator of a large corporate network that was due to migrate to Windows 2000. I wont say that I didn't learn anything, but what I have learnt is of very little use to me. I also can't comment on the value of the training as my boss paid and I don't know the cost. Let's just hope it was precious little! The course must be followed by exam 70-21- and 70-215 in order to gain the MCP qualification. If I take the exams I will update you! Thanks for listening, I know I rant on a bit...;) * 2152B Course Outline * Module 1: Installing or Upgrading to Windows 2000 Lab Installing Windows 2000 Module 2: Configuring the Windows 2000 Environment Labs Creating and Using Hardware Profiles Modifying Startup and Recovery Options Configuring Internet Options Module 3: Connecting Windows 2000?based Clients to Networks Labs Configuring and Testing IP Addresses Installing and Configuring Gateway (and Client) Services for NetWare Module 4: Creating and Managing User Accounts Labs Creating Local User Accounts Creating and Modifying Domain User Accounts Module 5: Managing Access to Resources by Using Groups Lab Creating a Global Group Module 6: Managing Data by Using NTFS Labs Using NTFS Permissions Configuring Disk Compression and Quotas Securing Files by Using EFS Module 7: Providing Network Access to File Resources Labs Sharing and Securing Network Resources Configuring Domain-based Dfs Module 8: Monitoring and Optimizing Performance in Windows 2000 Labs Using Task Manager and Event Viewer Monitoring System Performance Module 9: Implementing Security in Windows 2000 Labs
Configuring Windows 2000 Security Settings Configuring Auditing Module 10: Configuring Printing Labs Installing Printers on a Print Server Installing a Client Printer and Managing Printers Module 11: Configuring Windows 2000 for Mobile Computing Labs Configuring Power Management Options Configuring Offline Files Module 12: Configuring and Managing Disks Labs Working with Dynamic Disks Creating and Mounting a New Volume Module 13: Implementing Disaster Protection Labs Implementing Fault-Tolerant Volumes Backing Up and Restoring System State Data Module 14: Installing and Configuring Terminal Services Labs Installing Terminal Services Installing an Application Module 15: Implementing Windows 2000 Clients Labs Creating an Answer File for an Unattended Installation Running the System Preparation Tool Module 16: Implementing Windows 2000?based Servers
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 21/08/01 It all sounds rather stressful - what an in-depth review! ~Deenie~ |
|
- 18/08/01 A useful opinion, I'm sure, but I think it is the course provider that you disliked so much rather than the actual MCP course. OTOH, my partner, who has done several MS courses, would probably agree with everything you wrote. We are slightly biased against MS. :) ~Fi |
|
- 16/08/01 I can't comment on the Windows 2000 course, however I got my MCP in Implementing Workstation & Server for NT 4.0 (now retired for Windows 2000). What I will say about the courses, as both my hubby & I did the same courses at different teaching institutes. The courses, the teaching and the teaching materials vary greatly from institute to institute. We both did the same course but had completely different books and course materials and the trainers (I nearly wrote teacher too there!) gave us the odd wrong answer as well - luckily we combined our teaching materials and managed to sort it out between ourselves! Our courses cost £2000 (full MCSE), whereas there were other better institutes charging up to £6,000! I'm sure that the standard of materials and teaching is no reflection on Microsoft - just the institute that you are trained at!
Windows 2000 is a new product and with all new products you tend to get the odd problem (but then again Windows 98 is a pain in the butt too!!!!)
I must admit I also found it really hard to take it all in when given so much new information all at once (I had never used NT 4.0 when I started the course!) and I stopped the trainer every 2 seconds as well. I was really lucky in that I was allowed by the college to sit through the course a second time when they ran it again a month later. (5 days each time) Fortunately I passed my exams while 6.5 months pregnant. I never finished my MCSE, but my hubby did & now he is earning a living in IT. (So the course does have its uses!!!!) |
View all
14
comments
|