Newest Review: ... a chicken nugget burger, a hamburger or fries for 99p, and a junior whopper for 1.49. Burger King also have a daily deal called King ... more
A better quality McDonalds
Member Name: smooch15
Advantages: Better quality food
Disadvantages: More expensive than McDonalds, less tasty fries
Burger King is another very popular fast-food restaurant, although probably not quite as popular as McDonalds. The food that they serve is all very similar to McDonalds including items such as beef burgers, chicken burgers, fries, chicken nuggets, that sort of thing, but their prices are a little higher which is probably why most people opt to eat at McDonalds the majority of the time.
Saying that though, the quality of their food is actually quite a bit better than McDonalds. The chicken doesn't taste quite as chewy and doesn't seem like chopped up and processed crappy meat and the beef burgers are a bit thicker and are made with proper Angus beef so the look, taste and quality is quite a bit better.
The Chicken Royale Burger is my favourite item from Burger King which is very similar to McDonalds McChicken Burger only a bit bigger and a bit better quality. The chicken breast is really delicious and the roll is always very soft and the lettuce very crispy and it does taste like it's not quite as unhealthy as a McDonalds one.
The only thing I'm not so keen on here is the fries which aren't quite as nice as McDonalds' or KFC's fries - I don't think they're made with enough salt or maybe it's a different oil they're cooked with but they taste a bit plain compared to other fries from fast-food restaurants.
McDonalds is seen as a very quick and cheap place to eat whereas I think Burger King is more of a once every now and then place because the food is better quality and the price is more expensive. Both restaurants aren't the healthiest place to eat, but if you're going for quality over price, then Burger King is definitely the one to go to.
Summary: Better quality food than McDonalds