| Product: |
HP Scanjet 2400 |
| Date: |
19/01/06 (398 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: Valuve for Money, Very Easy to Use
Disadvantages: Resolution Not As Good As Higher Priced Scanners
I Have this scanner and can tell you first hand that the quality of the Scans are brilliaint. It is definately value for money and is well worth having.
I dont not think you need a scanner woth £400 unless you are using it to run a business is photography or anything where you need the results to be perfect to the point.
This scanner is good enough for home and office use and i would definately reccomend it to anyone who needs a scanner.
The HP ScanJet 2400 digital flatbed scanner is a slim, attractive and affordable scanner that will get you started in no time at all. One-touch buttons provide automatic scanning and color copying, while 1200 dpi optical resolution and 48-bit color mean great results from day one. Designed for home users who want a simple, easy-to-use scanner, one that provides a step-by-step approach to achieving results in minutes but also delivers superb quality scans.
Main specifications
Manufacturer's Part Number: Q3841A
Max Supported Media Size: 216 x 297 mm
System Requirements: Microsoft Windows 98/ME, Apple MacOS X 10.1 or later, Apple MacOS 9.1 or later, Microsoft Windows 2000 / XP
Manufacturer Warranty: 1 year warranty
Scan Speed: 45 sec / page (grey)
Device Type: Flatbed scanner
Supported Media Type: Plain paper
Max Document Size: 216 mm (Letter A Size) x 297 mm (A4)
Media Feeder Type: Manual load
Product Description: HP ScanJet 2400 Digital Flatbed Scanner - flatbed scanner
Interface Type: Hi-Speed USB
Resolution: 48-bit colour
Dimensions (WxDxH): 45.8 cm x 27.5 cm x 6.2 cm
Weight: 2.2 kg
Optical Resolution: 1200 dpi x 1200 dpi
Input Type: Colour
Summary: Perfect First Scanner For Home and Office Use
| Processing/Quality: |
|
 |
| Reliability: |
|
 |
| Ease of use: |
|
 |
| Noise: |
|
 |
| Speed: |
|
 |
| Scanning quality: |
|
 |
|
Last comments:
|
- 20/01/06 This is not really of much value to anyone. Try adding some personal opinion. How does it perform with different types of documents, how fast is it, how easy does it interface with the bundled software etc etc etc... |
|
- 19/01/06 I think this would have been much more useful with more personal opinion and experience - the technical stuff is available in lots of places. I'd like to read more about what you think. |
|