Celestron Astromaster 130 EQ Reviews
Product Type: Celestron telescopes
Description:Model ID 822025 / Brand: Celestron / Type: Reflecting telescope
Newest Review: ... criteria. Are there better optical performers out there? Yes! Are there sturdier and more solid mounts out there, without ... more
Price Comparison for Celestron Astromaster 130 EQ
Customer Celestron Astromaster 130 EQ Reviews (1)
by - written on 28/04/12, updated on 28/04/12 (Very useful, 78 readings)
I cut my astronomical teeth on Celestron's refractors and as such the company is synonymous with nostalgic fondness in my mind, however, that was a long time ago and the world of astronomy has moved on since then. Have Celestron managed to keep up with the curve with their low cost reflector, the Astromaster? Well, the answer is yes...and no. The Astromaster's strength undoubtedly lies in it's affordability and all of its attributes should be judged primarily against this criteria. Are there better optical performers out there? Yes! Are there sturdier and more solid mounts out there, without question! But few scopes manage to provide these things at such an ... Read the complete review
Products Similar to Celestron Astromaster 130 EQ
Celestron Omni XLT 127 - Very portable, quality optics, suitable for astrophotography You pay for portability, if space is not an issue your money may be better spent purely on quality
Celestron NexImage - Incredibly easy to use - you can take pictures in minutes Only 640 x 480 resolution
Celestron 76 mm Firstscope - Price, eyepieces, lightweight, moveable base, easy to use None
|More products in Telescope|
All these and are taken from reviews of the dooyooCommunity.
|Celestron CPC 1100|
Superb optical quality. Accurate tracking. Easy alignment.
It's heavy and extremely expensive.
Portable, good beginners scope
Mounts not great
|Skywatcher 130/650 EQ-2|
Good level of magnification for the price. An ideal first telescope which won't become obsolete.
Can be awkward to store in a smaller house
|Celestron Dual Axis Motor Drive for CG-4|
Reliable and effective
Not exactly cheap
|Meade Lightbridge Dobsonian|
Portable and optically brilliant
Excess vibration, needs to be collimated much more regularl
|Meade ETX-LS ACF|
Lots of technology, built in ccd
Tripod should be sturdier, overpriced, views are good but certainly not worth £1200
|Televue 25mm Plossl 1.25" Eyepiece|
Flat field, works fantastically even on faster telescopes
Cannot be considered cheap (although neither is it over priced).