| Product: |
WWE Smackdown |
| Date: |
03/06/01 (38 review reads) |
| Rating: |
 |
Advantages: Good matches , Fun to watch
Disadvantages: Can you be bothered to watch 2 hours of WWF
It's a strange thing to actually name a weekly show after a wrestlers slogan (the rock). They could have called it Bottom line etc. The show it's self is basically the same as RAW is WAR, but a different set and different matches. All of the main storyline and matches in the WWf occur on either RAW or Smackdown. This gets me annoyed only for the reason that if i miss one then i won't understand what happens next week. I suppose if your a hardcore WWF fan then you can catch them both but i find that watching superstars or heat enables you to get the best matches and news from RAW and Smackdown. So, i'd say if you can't be bothered to watch RAW or Smackdown then go watch superstars/heat. Smackdown is really fun to watch and is almost like a PPV because all the matches have high stakes involved (e.g title belts). I also like the set as it looks much cooler then RAW is war. Features of Smackdown: - Loads of title matches - Hardcore matches 9de to it being late night WWf, you see the actually chair shots etc. :)) - Story lines and news is always annouced on Smackdown -2 hours long -FUN FUN FUN
Summary:
|
Last comments:
|
- 03/06/01 The Smackdown! set is nowhere near as good as Raw's. Raw's is atmospheric, Smackdown's is just an eyesore...get rid of it!!
Perhaps a bit more info could have been added, but fair points made.
Smark. |
|
- 03/06/01 Need more to get VU. Let me know if you update it. :) |
|